An inexact fuzzy bi-level programming model for energy–traffic system planning under uncertainty: a case study of Urumqi city, China
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In this study, an inexact fuzzy bi-level programming model was developed for regional energy and traffic system management under uncertainty in Urumqi city, China. The energy system and traffic system are important subsystems of regional areas such as cities. The coordinated management of regional subsystems is a difficult problem for regional management. A bi-level programming model is an appropriate and simple method to describe the coordinated management of regional subsystems. The energy and traffic structure adjustment, clean power generation and pollutant emission–reduction targets are designed to support the construction of an environmentally sustainable city in China. Methods of interval parameter programming and bi-level programming were incorporated into the developed model to tackle uncertainties and reflect the features in the system. The environmental impacts of energy and traffic activities and policies were analysed. The results are valuable for supporting the management or justification of the existing energy and traffic policies and schemes under uncertainty.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it