MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Quebec Platelet Disorder Is Caused by a Cis-Acting Mutation near the Plasminogen Activator Gene (PLAU) That Increases PLAU Transcription by Megakaryocytes.

2008· article· en· W2553615480 on OpenAlexaffabout
Maria Diamandis, Andrew D. Paterson, Johanna M. Rommens, D. Kika Veljkovic, Jessica Blavignac, John S. Waye, Francine Derome, Georges E. Rivard, Catherine P.M. Hayward

Bibliographic record

VenueBlood · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPlatelet Disorders and Treatments
Canadian institutionsCentre Hospitalier Universitaire Sainte-JustineHospital for Sick ChildrenUniversity of TorontoMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBiologyMolecular biologySouthern blotGeneticsGeneAllele

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Quebec platelet disorder (QPD) is an autosomal dominant disorder, with high penetrance, that is associated with increased risks for bleeding and a gain-of-function defect in fibrinolysis. Its hallmark feature is a markedly increased platelet content of urokinase plasminogen activator (uPA), without systemic fibrinolysis or increased uPA in plasma or urine. Recent studies of 28 affected and 110 unaffected individuals from the QPD pedigree linked the disorder to a 2 megabase region on chromosome 10q containing PLAU, the uPA gene (J Thromb Haemost2007;5: Suppl.2: O-S-021). This led us to investigate if QPD was caused by a mutation within or near PLAU, and if the disorder increased transcription of one or both PLAU alleles in megakaryocytes. Single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) arrays (Illumina 1M BeadChip), Southern blotting, and sequencing were used to investigate genetic changes within the linked region (n= 1–3 QPD and 1–3 control individuals). To assess expression of PLAU alleles, heterozygous individuals (n= 4 QPD, 5 controls) were evaluated by a quantitative Taqman® 5’ nuclease assay for SNP rs4065 alleles (T/C; T allele inherited by all affected individuals) using reverse transcribed mRNA from platelets, CD 34+ hematopoietic progenitors, and saliva. Quantitative RTPCR of QPD platelet mRNA was used to determine if the disorder increased expression of the genes flanking PLAU on chromosome 10 which encode vinculin (VCL) and calmodulin-dependent protein kinase IIγ (CAMK2G). No abnormalities near PLAU were detected in QPD subjects evaluated by Southern blotting. No insertions or duplications were detected by SNP array analysis, which provided data on 80 markers over the region of chromosome 10 nearest to PLAU. Analysis of a rare SNP, 13.7 kb upstream of PLAU, that was present in 28/28 with QPD and 4/110 unaffected family members, confirmed linkage of the region near PLAU to QPD (LOD score +11.8). Sequence analyses confirmed a common QPD haplotype for the linked region and excluded the possibility that QPD resulted from mutations in the promoter or in the 11 exons and 10 introns of PLAU. No mutations were found by extended sequencing of the regions extending 20 kb upstream and 1 kb downstream of PLAU which includes all of its known regulatory elements and the 3’ message instability region. Analysis of SNP rs4065 in PLAU indicated that there was a marked increased expression of the linked T allele in QPD platelets (>150-fold increase; p = <0.016 compared to controls; confirmed by sequencing) but minimal (2–4 fold) increased expression of this allele in QPD CD 34+ cells and saliva cells. Unlike PLAU, VCL and CAMK2G were not overexpressed in QPD platelets. Our data indicate that inheritance of QPD results from a cis-regulatory defect, outside the known regulatory elements of PLAU, that generates profibrinolytic platelets by markedly increasing transcription of the linked PLAU allele during megakaryopoiesis, without increasing PLAU transcription by non-hematopoietic saliva cells.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.474
Threshold uncertainty score0.953

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0110.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.232
Teacher spread0.214 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2008
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBlood→Same topicPlatelet Disorders and Treatments→French-language works237,207→