MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2553712272 · doi:10.2118/183090-ms

Design a Multiport Completion with Inflow Control Devices: Hydraulic Modeling to Meet Financial Function Optimization in a High Water Cut and CO2 Environment

2016· article· en· W2553712272 on OpenAlexaffabout
Ransis Kais, Nicolas Gomez Bustamante, A. F. Elarabi

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicReservoir Engineering and Simulation Methods
Canadian institutionsApache (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCompletion (oil and gas wells)InflowPetroleum engineeringNozzleInjectorPort (circuit theory)Well controlInjection wellProduction (economics)Environmental scienceHydraulic fracturingEngineeringMechanical engineeringGeologyDrilling

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The Midale field, located in Saskatchewan, Canada, is one of the largest water-alternate-gas (WAG) injection operations in the world for enhanced oil recovery (EOR). Wells are normally completed across the three main oil horizons of the Marly formation (M1, M2, and M3), with production from all three zones being commingled. Horizontal producers and injectors are openhole wells, whereas vertical wells are usually casedhole. After years of operation, the WAG injected fluids started to communicate from injectors toward producers, resulting in high water and CO2 cuts and making oil production optimization and recovery more challenging. A new completion was envisioned to improve the oil producers’ rates and overall EOR performance. A casedhole vertical well was selected for upgrading into a new adaptable multiport completion, designed to give independent control of each zone. This new completion was designed considering the challenges of the produced fluids, as well as the interaction between each port, the nozzle size of each inflow control devices (ICD), and the financial impact of producing higher rates under the current (2015–2016) market, which is challenged by low oil prices. The engineering analyses used a steady-state hydraulic well model and a compositional fluid model to consider the impact of the CO2 operating in near critical conditions. Production well tests and laboratory analysis were used to tune the hydraulic well model and the fluid model, respectively. The optimization workflow used the ICD nozzle sizes as decision variables for each port of the new completion, and the financial function, which used reference prices for oil and handling costs for gas and water as coefficients, was maximized by a numerical mixed integer nonlinear programming (MINLP) solver for each case of study. The ICD nozzle sizes were selected for each port of the new completion, based on the hydraulic performance of a series of possible production scenarios, the optimization of the financial function, and the available settings of the ports. This paper presents the results of an integration of production test separator data, production logging test (PLT) surveys, fluid pressure/volume/temperature (PVT) data, equation of state (EOS) fluid models, hydraulic models, and optimization solvers. These data and models enabled engineers to analyze several possible ICD designs to maximize financial gain.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.572
Threshold uncertainty score0.355

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.196
Teacher spread0.182 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2016
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicReservoir Engineering and Simulation MethodsFrench-language works237,207