A Prospective Cohort Study of Upper Extremity Deep Vein Thrombosis
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Introduction. Upper extremity deep vein thrombosis (UEDVT) is a relatively uncommon event with potentially serious complications. Its optimal treatment and clinical outcomes are not well studied. The objective of our study was to assess the safety and efficacy of a standardized management protocol for UEDVT as well as its long term complications. Patients and methods. We conducted a prospective cohort study at 5 Canadian centres and enrolled adult patients with a symptomatic UEDVT confirmed by compression ultrasound involving the brachial or more proximal veins, with or without a pulmonary embolism (PE). Exclusions included pregnancy, dialysis catheter thrombosis, active or high bleeding risk, platelet count <100x109/L, creatinine clearance < 30 ml/min, on warfarin for other indications, hemodynamically unstable PE, acute leukemia or undergoing a stem cell transplant within 3 months, geographical inaccessibility, life expectancy <3 months or treatment with low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) or warfarin for more than 7 days since diagnosis. Standardized treatment regimens were as follows: spontaneous or central venous catheter (CVC)-related UEDVT were treated with dalteparin at therapeutic doses for at least 5 days followed by warfarin adjusted according to INR results. Spontaneous UEDVT was treated for at least 6 months and CVC-related events were treated for at least 3 months or for as long as the line remained in place and for at least 1 month after line removal. Cancer patients with non CVC-related UEDVT were treated using dalteparin alone for a minimum of 6 months. Main outcomes were objectively documented venous thromboembolism (VTE) recurrence, major bleeding and death. All outcomes were centrally adjudicated. Patients were followed for 2 years. Data was analyzed using descriptive statistics. Survival data was analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier Method. Post-hoc analyses were conducted comparing CVC and spontaneous events. The study was approved by all institutional review boards. Results. Between 2009 and 2012, we enrolled 141 patients: 75 with spontaneous and 66 with CVC related UEDVT. Mean age was 51 years; 55% were males. The population characteristics are shown in the Table. The 2 year cumulative incidence of VTE recurrence was 3.5% (95% CI 1.5-8), of major bleeding was 2.8% (95% CI 1.1-7.1) and of death was 22% (95% CI 16-29.5). VTE recurrence rate was no different for spontaneous vs. CVC-related groups (4% vs. 3%; Log-Rank P = 0.690; Figure). Conclusion. The use of a standardized management protocol for patients with UEDVT results in a low risk of VTE recurrence and major bleeding at 2 years of follow up, in both CVC-related and spontaneous UEDVT. Table 1. Population characteristics Spontaneous UEDVT Catheter-related UEDVT Total P-value N % N % N % Demographics Age (Mean [SD]) 48.6 [17.8] 54.9 [13.6] 51.6 [16.2] NS Male gender 44 58.7 34 51.5 78 55.3 NS Caucasian 67 89.3 64 97.0 131 92.9 NS Comorbidities Previous VTE 3 4.0 2 3.0 5 3.5 NS Prior or concurrent cancer 22 29.3 48 72.7 70 49.6 <0.001 Prior gastrointestinal Bleeding 6 8.0 5 7.6 11 7.8 NS Type of Catheter NE Hickman - - 1 1.5 1 0.7 PICC - - 49 74.2 49 34.8 Porta Cath - - 16 24.2 16 11.3 Thrombus Location Subclavian 54 72.0 43 65.2 97 68.8 NS Superior vena cava 0 0.0 2 3.0 2 1.4 NS Brachiocephalic 5 6.7 10 15.2 15 10.6 NS Internal Jugular 16 21.3 14 21.2 30 21.3 NS Axillary 39 52.0 34 51.5 73 51.8 NS External Jugular 1 1.3 2 3.0 3 2.1 NS Treatment Duration 3 Months 26 34.7 19 28.8 45 31.9 <0.001 6 Months 37 49.3 4 6.1 41 29.1 0.000 Other 12 16.0 43 65.2 55 39.0 0.000 Figure 1. Kaplan-Meier survival curve for VTE recurrence Figure 1. Kaplan-Meier survival curve for VTE recurrence Disclosures Lazo-Langner: Bayer: Honoraria; Pfizer: Honoraria. Wells:Bayer: Honoraria; BMS/Pfizer: Research Funding. Carrier:BMS: Research Funding; Bayer: Consultancy; Pfizer: Consultancy; LEO Pharma: Consultancy, Research Funding. Kovacs:Bayer: Honoraria, Research Funding; LEO Pharma: Honoraria; Daiichi Sankyo Pharma: Research Funding; Pfizer: Honoraria, Research Funding.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".