L’essai cinématographique chez Hubert Aquin
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Hubert Aquin est reconnu comme l’un des plus grands écrivains québécois, mais il est moins connu comme réalisateur et producteur de l’Office national du film. En 1960, Hubert Aquin demande à Roland Barthes d’écrire le commentaire de son film Le sport et les hommes , afin de souligner l’aspect théâtral du sport et d’en questionner la spectacularisation. Barthes accepte ce projet tout à fait en accord avec sa réflexion sur les Mythologies , dont il vient de publier un aspect en 1957. Cet article propose de comprendre dans quelles conditions le film a été produit, avant de le comparer avec d’autres films sur le sport de la même époque (principalement La lutte [Michel Brault, Marcel Carrière, Claude Fournier, Claude Jutra, 1961] et Vive le Tour! [Louis Malle, 1962]), afin de mettre en évidence des visions différentes du medium cinématographique.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.006 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.013 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".