MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2554081376 · doi:10.1002/kin.21053

Complex Nonlinear Behavior in the Bromate–2‐Aminophenol Reaction

2016· article· en· W2554081376 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Chemical Kinetics · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicNonlinear Dynamics and Pattern Formation
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Windsor
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBromateChemistrySulfuric acidOscillation (cell signaling)Inorganic chemistryAnalytical Chemistry (journal)Chromatography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ABSTRACT The bromate–2‐aminophenol reaction in a batch reactor was investigated in this research, in which both simple and sequential oscillations were observed. The occurrence of sequential oscillations were found to be very sensitive to changes of the initial concentrations, where decreasing the concentration of sulfuric acid or sodium bromate or increasing the 2‐aminophenol concentration caused the two oscillation windows to coalesce. Lowering the reaction temperature from 30 to 5°C also caused the two oscillation windows to merge into one. A phase diagram in the bromate–sulfuric acid concentration plane demonstrates that sequential oscillations only occur within a narrow band of conditions. Mechanistic studies of the system through employing 1 H NMR and mass spectrometry suggest that a dibrominated ortho‐benzoquinone is a major product. The oxidation of 2‐aminophenol, on the other hand, can lead to the formation of pyrocatechol, which may be the substrate responsible for the second set of oscillations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.418
Threshold uncertainty score0.198

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.282
Teacher spread0.259 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it