MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

First report of <i>Podosphaera xanthii</i> causing powdery mildew on red chilli pepper in Vietnam

2015· article· en· W2554169799 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Le Thi Tam, Phạm Ngọc Dũng, Y. Sato

Bibliographic record

VenueNew Disease Reports · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicPlant Pathogens and Fungal Diseases
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPowdery mildewConidiumPepperBiologyMyceliumHorticultureBotanyBlightAppressoriumSporeGermination

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Capsicum frutescens (red chilli pepper) is one of the most important and widely grown spice crops in Vietnam. Typical symptoms of powdery mildew were first observed on C. frutescens grown under glasshouse conditions at the National University of Agriculture in 2014. White fungal colonies were observed on both sides of mature and young leaves (Fig. 1a). Later, during a field survey in spring 2015, powdery mildew was observed on field-grown C. frutescens, affecting up to approximately 35% of the plants. Although powdery mildew on C. frutescens mainly attacks foliage and stems, if left untreated the disease can significantly slow plant growth and reduce yield. A representative specimen was deposited in the Plant Protection Research Institute Herbarium in Hanoi. Microscopic examination showed conidiophores with a catenescent form of conidiogenesis, composed of (2-)2-3(-4) cells, and measuring (81-)83-110(-122) μm long. Foot-cells of conidiophores measured (29-)31-51(-56) x (10-)10-11(-12) μm (Fig. 1b). Conidia produced in chains were variable in shape, doliiform, ellipsoid to ovoid, and measured (25-)28-34(-37) x (15-)17-21(-23) μm with a length/width ratio of (1.2-)1.4-1.8(-2.0). Conidia had distinct fibrosin bodies (Fig. 1c) and germinated with brevitubus sub-type of Fibroidium-type germ tubes (Fig. 1d). No chasmothecia were found. Appressoria on mycelium had a nipple shape. The morphological characteristics were consistent with descriptions of Podosphaera xanthii (Braun & Cook, 1). To confirm the identity of the causal fungus, the complete ITS region of rDNA from the representative specimen was amplified with universal primer pair HF1/HR4 (Tam et al., 4) and directly sequenced. The resulting sequence of 525 bp (GenBank Accession No. KR779868) was compared to other GenBank sequences using BLAST analysis and revealed a 99% sequence identity with Podosphaera xanthii isolates (KM505135, KP120971) on other hosts from the region (Cho et al., 2015; Liu & Kirschner, 3). Pathogenicity was confirmed through inoculation tests by gently pressing diseased leaves of C. frutescens onto young leaves of five three-week-old potted seedlings of C. frutescens. Five non-inoculated seedlings were used as controls. The plants were maintained in a glasshouse at 26-28°C. Inoculated leaves developed symptoms after seven days, whereas the control plants remained symptomless. The fungus present on the inoculated leaves was morphologically identical to that observed on the original diseased leaves with the same PCR sequence following the above described protocol, thereby fulfilling Koch's postulates. Previous literature reports different powdery mildews on Capsicum species, including Leiveillula braunii in Israel, L. taurica in Canada and India, and Oidiopsis sicula in Thailand (Voytyuk et al., 2009; Yáñez-Morales et al., 5). Although, P. xanthii has been found on many hosts in different families throughout the world (Braun & Cook, 1), to our knowledge this is the first report of P. xanthii infection of C. frutescens in Vietnam, as well as in the world. The disease seems to be a potential threat to spice production from C. frutescens in Vietnam.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.010
Threshold uncertainty score0.020

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.246
Teacher spread0.229 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNew Disease ReportsSame topicPlant Pathogens and Fungal DiseasesFrench-language works237,207