Enhanced Robustness of State Estimator to Bad Data Processing Through Multi-innovation Analysis
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
To enhance the robustness of a power system state estimator to topology errors, bad critical measurements, multiple non-interacting, or interacting bad data (BD), this paper presents a new robust detection method by exploiting the temporal correlation and the statistical consistency of measurements. Particularly, we propose three innovation matrices to capture the measurement correlation and statistical consistency by processing the forecasted states/measurements and the interpolated reliable information from phasor measurement units. The latter is achieved by using a robust generalized maximum-likelihood estimator. We then propose to apply the projection statistics (PS) to the proposed innovation matrices for BD detection. Extensive Monte Carlo simulations and QQ-plots are carried out to obtain an analytical threshold of the statistical test of the PS. Because of the robustness of PS and the enhanced measurement redundancy by the innovations, the proposed method is able to handle various types of BD in both PMU observable and PMU partially observable power systems. Moreover, the proposed method is suitable for parallel implementation, and can be integrated with online applications. Comparison results with existing methods under different BD conditions on IEEE 14-bus, 118-bus, and Polish 2383-bus test systems demonstrate the effectiveness and robustness of the proposed method.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it