MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Incidence, Risk Factors for Early Hepatotoxicity and Its Impact on Survival in Patients with Myelofibrosis Undergoing Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation

2011· article· en· W2554212826 on OpenAlexaff
Kit Man Wong, Eshetu G. Atenafu, Dennis Dong Hwan Kim, John Kuruvilla, Jeffrey H. Lipton, Hans A. Messner, Vikas Gupta

Bibliographic record

VenueBlood · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMyeloproliferative Neoplasms: Diagnosis and Treatment
Canadian institutionsPrincess Margaret Cancer CentreUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineGastroenterologyInternal medicineMyelofibrosisPortal vein thrombosisPolycythemia veraTransplantationPortal hypertensionLiver transplantationIncidence (geometry)Liver functionHepatic veno-occlusive diseaseCumulative incidenceSurgeryHematopoietic stem cell transplantationThrombosisBone marrowCirrhosis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Abstract 1951 Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) is the only curative treatment for myelofibrosis (MF), but it is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Hepatotoxicity is an important regimen-related toxicity of HCT. MF is a myeloproliferative disorder with several features that may impair hepatic function and predispose to liver injury. These include extramedullary hematopoiesis, increased hepatic iron overload from blood transfusions, portal hypertension, and splanchnic vein thrombosis (SVT). It is hypothesized that patients with MF are at high risk of acute hepatocellular injury after allogeneic HCT due to existing hepatic impairment and/or underlying risk factors for hepatotoxicity. We conducted a retrospective chart review of consecutive patients (pts) with MF who underwent HCT from 1981 to 2011 to assess the incidence of liver toxicity, risk factors and its impact on survival. 53 pts were identified: idiopathic MF, 39; post-polycythemia vera (PV) MF, 4; post-essential thrombocytopenia (ET) MF, 10. 94% of the transplants were performed after 1995. The International Prognostic Scoring System (IPSS) at the time of HCT included intermediate 2 risk (34%) and high risk (55%). Pre-HCT transfusion dependency according to Gale criteria was observed in 60% pts. 11 pts (21%) had a significant history of hepatoportal disease (i.e. SVT, biopsy proven hepatic iron overload, evidence of portal hypertension). Conditioning intensity was myeloablative in 66% and reduced in 34%. Mean baseline values of bilirubin, AST and serum albumin were 14uM (4–38), 24U/L (8–90) and 39g/L (30–49), respectively. The incidence of mild (34.2mM to 102.6mM), moderate (102.6mM to 342mM) and severe (greater than 342mM) hyperbilirubinemia in the first 6 weeks post-HCT was 32%, 40% and 4%, respectively. The frequency of transaminitis (AST >2x ULN) was 29%. On average, albumin decreased by 9 +/− 4g/L, where a reduction of 10g/L or greater was observed in 44% of patients. There were 18 cases (35%) of hepatic veno-occlusive disease. In a bivariate analysis, older age at HCT, female gender and longer disease duration were significantly associated with AST elevation, while a history of hepatoportal disease predicted hyperbilirubinemia. The etiology of MF (i.e. idiopathic, post-PV, post-ET), IPSS, transfusion dependency, degree of hepatosplenomegaly, donor match and conditioning intensity had no impact on hepatocellular injury. Significantly lower overall survival was associated with moderate/severe hyperbilirubinemia (p 0.02) and severe AST elevation (p 0.02). The hazard ratios for non-relapse mortality (NRM) for moderate/severe rises in bilirubin and AST were 4.36 and 7.24, respectively. Our study shows a high risk of early hepatotoxicity in MF patients undergoing HCT. Early hepatotoxicity is an important cause of NRM and inferior survival in this population. These findings are useful in patient counseling and improving the selection of patients with MF for HCT, as well as in monitoring those at risk for acute hepatocellular injury in the post-HCT setting. Disclosures: Gupta: Incyte: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.241
Teacher spread0.224 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBloodSame topicMyeloproliferative Neoplasms: Diagnosis and TreatmentFrench-language works237,207