MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2554217697 · doi:10.1021/acsphotonics.6b00523

Magnetoplasmonic Faraday Rotators: Enabling Gigahertz Active Polarization Control for Integrated Plasmonics

2016· article· en· W2554217697 on OpenAlexafffund
C. J. Firby, Amr S. Helmy, A. Y. Elezzabi

Bibliographic record

VenueACS Photonics · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMagneto-Optical Properties and Applications
Canadian institutionsUniversity of TorontoUniversity of Alberta
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsPolarization (electrochemistry)PlasmonMaterials scienceFaraday effectOptoelectronicsFaraday cageOpticsFaraday rotatorPolarization controllerPolarization rotatorPhotonicsMagnetic fieldPhysicsWavelengthBirefringence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We present the design and theoretical characterization of a magnetoplasmonic Faraday rotator for active polarization control in integrated plasmonics. By incorporating bismuth-substituted yttrium iron garnet (Bi:YIG) into a unique hybrid ridge–plasmonic waveguide structure, we effectively overcome the phase-matching limitations between photonic TE and plasmonic TM modes, and hence attain efficient Faraday rotation within a plasmonic device. The device provides 99.4% polarization conversion within a length of 830 μm, while the two modes exhibit propagation lengths in excess of 1 mm. This versatile optical building block can be operated with either a TE or TM input, making it ideal for polarization switching and polarization division multiplexing. Additionally, a buried Ag transmission line under the waveguide facilitates high-speed active polarization modulation by generating transient magnetic fields and modulating the Bi:YIG magnetization. We show that with these transient fields and an external static biasing field one can operate the device in either a pulsed-input pulsed-output mode, to produce a polarization switch, or a pulsed-input continuous-output mode, to produce a polarization oscillator. Such a device is shown to be capable of polarization modulation of 10 GHz and will be vital in realizing plasmonic circuits employing polarization diversity.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.000
Threshold uncertainty score0.002

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.199
Teacher spread0.191 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations18
Published2016
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueACS PhotonicsSame topicMagneto-Optical Properties and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207