MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2554337510

Ecclesiastical law (a thesis) / by E.A. Stafford.

2014· article· en· W2554337510 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Edward Stafford

Bibliographic record

VenueQSpace (Queen's University Library) · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicTheology and Canon Law Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLawPolitical science
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

^HE term, Ecclesiastical Law, is used here not merely, as in England, to describe the laws made by Parliament for the regulation of the Established Church, but in its widest sense, as including all law relating to religion.There is in Canada, as in other lands, much variety in the constitutions, rules and regulations of different churches.Are there any underlying lines of unity along which it is possible that they might flow to- gether into one strong constitution, adequate to all the demands that can come against a church ?This in- quiry must lead us back to the origin of Christianity.The great founder of the Christian religion at- tempted no organization of His followers into any- thing like the church of modern times.He set up no visible model before the coming ages.He created no permanent positions of pre-eminence among His people.He defined no clear lines along which, externally, His growing body should develop itself.After the work of teaching Christianity to the world fell wholly into the hands of the apostles, some signs of organization began to appear.But these in- spired teachers evidently had before their minds no definite plan of the future structure, as it was to be in every age, with all its varied appointments, and their respective relations to each other.The organization of Christianity, the integration of different parts, the bringing together of many congre- gations, and even of wide territories, under one juris- diction, the creation of officers, superior and inferior, with the definitions of duty pertaining to each, and fixing their proper relations, until the church was one compact body, all its parts subject to one head, and working together with military effectiveness,all this came only after centuries of growth, under changing conditions, according to the suggestions of practical necessity, or as cherished ambitions, or personal ani- mosities succeeded in burning their impress upon the rising structure.The Laity.*In the Christian dispensation, the Jewish idea of a wide distinction between the priesthood and the people, "Neander, "Church History," Section II."The laity have also the right to administer the sacraments, and to teach in the community.The Word of God and the sacraments were, by the grace of God, communicated to all, and may, therefore, be communicated by all Christians as instruments of the Divine grace."Tertullian, in Be Baptismo."All were accustomed to teach and to baptize."Coleman,The Apostolical and Primitive Church.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.696
Threshold uncertainty score0.997

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.157
Teacher spread0.151 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueQSpace (Queen's University Library)Same topicTheology and Canon Law StudiesFrench-language works237,207