MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2554368353 · doi:10.1002/lary.26391

Prevalence of polyp recurrence after endoscopic sinus surgery for chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyposis

2016· article· en· W2554368353 on OpenAlexaff
Adam S. DeConde, Jess C. Mace, Joshua M. Levy, Luke Rudmik, Jeremiah A. Alt, Timothy L. Smith

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Laryngoscope · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicSinusitis and nasal conditions
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
FundersNational Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders
KeywordsMedicineNasal polypsPolypectomyEndoscopyOdds ratioSurgeryConfidence intervalProspective cohort studyInternal medicineCohortCohort studyMultivariate analysisGastroenterologyCancerColorectal cancerColonoscopy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS: Chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyposis (CRSwNP) is a disease process that is driven, in part, by intrinsic mucosal inflammation. Surgery plus continued medical therapy is commonly elected by medically recalcitrant, symptomatic patients. The objective was to evaluate the prevalence of nasal polyp recurrence up to 18 months after endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS) with congruent continuing medical management. STUDY DESIGN: Prospective, multicenter cohort of adult patients undergoing ESS for medically recalcitrant CRSwNP performed between August 2004 and February 2015. METHODS: All patients received baseline nasal endoscopy quantified using Lund-Kennedy grading. All patients included for final analysis provided at least 6 months of postoperative endoscopy examinations. Multivariate analysis was used to identify risk factors for polyp recurrence. RESULTS: Three hundred sixty-three CRSwNP patients having undergone ESS involving polypectomy were enrolled. A total of 244 (67%) participants had graded postoperative endoscopies with average of follow-up of 14.3 ± 7.0 months. Surgery plus postoperative medical management significantly improved endoscopy total scores at 6 months (P < .001). The recurrence of nasal polyposis 6 months after ESS was 35% (68/197), compared to 38% (48/125) after 12 months, and 40% (52/129) after 18 months. Multivariate analysis identified both prior ESS (odds ratio [OR]: 2.6, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.5-4.6; P = .001) and worse preoperative polyposis severity (OR: 1.4, 95% CI: 1.1-1.8; P = .016) as risk factors for recurrent polyposis. CONCLUSIONS: Polyp recurrence is common after ESS with control of polyps up to 18 months found in approximately 60% to 70% of patients. Investigation into both surgical and medical management strategies is warranted to improve upon the observed prevalence of recurrence. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 2c. Laryngoscope, 127:550-555, 2017.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.256
Teacher spread0.240 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations423
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe LaryngoscopeSame topicSinusitis and nasal conditionsFrench-language works237,207