MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2554476311 · doi:10.1109/iecon.2014.7049165

Testing a complete control and protection system for multi-terminal MMC HVDC links using hardware-in-the-loop simulation

2014· article· en· W2554476311 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicReal-time simulation and control systems
Canadian institutionsOpal-Rt Technologies (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHardware-in-the-loop simulationWaveformTest benchFault (geology)Terminal (telecommunication)Computer scienceControl systemInterface (matter)Embedded systemEngineeringComputer hardwareSimulationVoltageElectrical engineeringOperating systemTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper presents the dynamic performance test of a complete control and protection system for a Multi-terminal MMC HVDC system using hardware-in-the-loop (HIL) simulation. A novel HIL bench with a cost-effective input and output interface between the control system under test and the real-time simulator is introduced. Two critical test cases, namely the start-up of the MMC connected to islanded networks and the AC fault in the bus close to the MMC substation are studied. The validity of the proposed methodology for the dynamic performance test is confirmed by comparing the results from the HIL test and the actual waveform recorded from the field, after the MMC is commissioned.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.826
Threshold uncertainty score0.494

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.066
GPT teacher head0.274
Teacher spread0.207 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations18
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicReal-time simulation and control systemsFrench-language works237,207