A Soft-Switching Bridgeless AC–DC Power Factor Correction Converter
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A new soft-switching, bridgeless power factor correction (PFC) boost converter is proposed for power supply and battery charging applications. The converter operates in both pulse width modulation (PWM) mode and resonant mode each switching cycle, and utilizes standard average current mode control. The converter is bridgeless, therefore eliminating the need for a front-end diode bridge rectifier. It operates in continuous conduction mode and achieves zero voltage switching (ZVS) for all switches. The proposed converter also reduces the turn-off losses of the PWM switches, therefore nearly eliminating switching losses. The output diodes operate with controlled di/dt turn-off, which reduces reverse-recovery losses. The PWM switches of the proposed converter can be driven with the same PWM signal, enabling simplified control. The detailed operation of the proposed converter is presented, including the conditions for ZVS operation and a stress analysis for the circuit components. Experimental results are presented for a 650-W prototype at 150-kHz switching frequency, universal ac input, and 400-V dc output. The proposed converter shows about 1% better efficiency and lower device temperatures at full load and 100-V ac input (maximum loss operating point) compared with the conventional hard switched PFC boost converter.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it