Análise da variabilidade da frequência cardíaca em cães obesos
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Título v AGRADECIMENTOS A Deus, por me proporcionar as condições necessárias para chegar até aqui.Aos meus pais, João e Elmadam, e ao meu marido, Anderson, por todo apoio e carinho, pelas palavras de ânimo e encorajamento.À minha orientadora, Profa.Dra.Gláucia Bueno Pereira Neto, por acreditar em mim e me dar a oportunidade de ser sua orientada.Ao Dr. Carlos Eduardo Vasconcelos da Silva, pelo aprendizado e crescimento profissional na área de cardiologia, por me incentivar a iniciar a pósgraduação.A toda equipe do Hospital Veterinário de Pequenos Animais da UnB, pelo suporte e colaboração durante o desenvolvimento da pesquisa.Aos tutores e cães que participaram do projeto, sem os quais não seria possível concluir nosso objetivo.A todos os animais, que são a razão da minha busca por aperfeiçoamento.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".