MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W255454809 · doi:10.1353/hpn.2012.a486162

The Poetics of Masculinity in Early Modern Italy and Spain (review)

2012· article· en· W255454809 on OpenAlex
Elvira Vilches

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueHispania · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicEarly Modern Spanish Literature
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPoeticsMasculinityPoliticsEarly modern EuropeEarly modern periodEliteHistoryPoetryLiteratureSociologyArtGender studiesClassicsLawAncient historyPolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Reviewed by: The Poetics of Masculinity in Early Modern Italy and Spain Elvira Vilches Milligan, Gerry, and Jane Tylus, eds. The Poetics of Masculinity in Early Modern Italy and Spain. Toronto: Centre for Reformation and Renaissance Studies, 2010. Pp. 398. ISBN 978-0-77272-059-7. The Poetics of Masculinity in Early Modern Italy and Spain is an engrossing collection of essays that adroitly examines the ways in which literary culture demonstrates, proves, and fashions masculinity in both Italy and Spain during the early modern period. Through thirteen essays that seamlessly explore case studies pertaining to both Italian and Spanish literatures, scholars study what models bound Italian and Spanish ideals of masculinity together and how they influenced one another. The interconnections between Spain and Italy during the sixteenth century are well known. The fate of the two regions had meshed through centuries of military and cultural exchange. Both territories experienced periods of political and cultural unrest that produced gender-focused arguments about empire, autonomy, and personhood. The analogy of a weakening nation and effeminacy dominated the political, cultural, and literary discourses of early modern Italy and Spain. The six essays on Spanish poetry, courtesy manuals, and theater included in this book focus on the impact that Italian cultural borrowings had on the policing of masculinity in Spain. Authors ponder how the shift from the medieval ideal of the Castilian unruly and brave warrior to the elite masculinity of the courtier brought about conflicting ways to understand manliness. Leah Middlebrook studies how the incorporation of Italian forms in poetry went hand-in-hand with the emergence of modern varieties of Spanish masculine identity. She argues that the Italian [End Page 554] model was most appealing because it helped mediate the changing relationships to authority that the rise of empire brought about. Modern heroes belonged to and were inserted in a strict hierarchy that encompassed not only court life but also the matters of a global monarchy. Authors such as Garcilaso, Hernando de Acuña, and Fernando de Herrera sought in the Italian verse the means to represent the modern courtier. Yet, disappointments with the imperial regimen led to reflections about how Italian letters may contaminate Spain's language and weaken its men. Garcilaso, for instance, called attention to the subjection of the courtier. Herrera, on the other hand, worried that linguistic contamination would weaken Spanish manliness. Italian conduct manuals had a great influence in early modern Spain. Boscan's translation of Castiglione's Il Cortegiano (1528) was published in 1534. Then followed Lucas Gracián Dantisco's El Galateo español (1593), the Spanish translation of Giovanni Della Casa's Galateo (1558). José A. Rico-Ferrer studies Dantisco's Galateo against the original in order to show how Dantisco proposes "a masculine self-fashioning where humor is an important ingredient of social exchange" (284). In the Spanish version, the use of jest and humor is determined by the increasing importance and value of social interaction over military virtue. In the seventeenth century, moralists and playwrights alike looked back to a glorified past of conquest, even though its heroes no longer seemed to be relevant to either the urban class or the soldiers of the feared Spanish tercios. Courtiers and soldiers who smelled nice and dressed to kill were motive of worry, scorn, and diversion. These concerns were ubiquitous even in such nationalistic foundational myths as Numantia. Harry Vélez-Quiñones studies two poignant moments in Cervantes's Numancia (1580): Scipio's address to the Roman troops along with the general exchange with the Numantine boy Bariato. The concern about effeminacy and sodomy cannot be ignored, especially if Scipio's words are read in the context of the historical sources of the play, such as Antonio de Guevara's famous Epístolas familiares (1539-42), the military culture of the period, the language of courtly love, and finally the well-known Ganymede myth. The controversial popularity of fashionable men attested also to the urgent need of fortifying masculinity. Diana Fox argues that, on the stage, these efforts resulted not only in regulations against male actors in drag, but also the use of the language of honor as an antidote against effeminacy...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.879
Threshold uncertainty score0.317

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.225
Teacher spread0.205 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it