MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2554736802 · doi:10.2527/jam2016-1051

1051 Effects of intrammamary LPS infusions on inflammation and reproductive parameters of dairy cows

2016· article· en· W2554736802 on OpenAlexaff
Carla Cristian Campos, Artur Cezar de Carvalho Fernandes, Ivan Hartling, Manminder Kaur, Ricarda Maria dos Santos, R.L.A. Cerri

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Animal Science · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicReproductive Physiology in Livestock
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAnimal scienceEndometritisSomatic cell countMorningSalineHaptoglobinMedicineBolus (digestion)Dairy cattleMilkingMastitisAndrologyLactationEndocrinologyInternal medicineIce calvingBiologyPregnancy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The objective was to determine the effects of LPS induced mastitis on systemic inflammatory response and early embryo development in lactating Holstein cows. Cows at 35 ± 7 DIM (n = 20) were submitted to a modified Double-Ovsynch program (10 d interval between protocols with CIDR and two PGF injections in the second protocol) and timed AI (d0). Cows were randomly assigned (block design) to two treatments: 1) LPS group- cows received an intrammamary infusions (d5 and d10) of 25 µg of LPS (strain 0111:B4) diluted in 10 mL of sterile saline at morning milkings; and 2) Control group- cows received infusion with saline. Blood samples were taken at different time intervals during the study to determine plasmatic concentrations of haptoglobin (Hp), tumoral necrosis factor α (TNF-α) and progesterone (P4). Milk samples were collected every 2 d for somatic cell count (SCC) and body temperature was recorded using a rumen-reticular bolus logger and summarized for every hour during the period. On Day 15 after AI, uterine flushing for embryo recover and interferon-tau (IFN-τ) measurement, as well as endometrium biopsy were performed. Data were analyzed using the MIXED procedure of SAS. Hp was greater in LPS compared with Control group (0.80 ± 0.06 vs. 0.45 ± 0.07; P < 0.01), but TNF-α concentration was similar (P = 0.72) between treatments. Milk production from d0 to d15 was greater for Control cows (37.5 ± 1.5 vs. 33.5 ± 1.3 kg/d; P < 0.01), whereas SCC was higher in LPS treated cows for about 48 h after each infusion (P < 0.01). Likewise, reticular temperature of LPS cows was elevated for 12 h (P < 0.01) after each infusion. Progesterone did not differ among treatments at all time collections (P = 0.72). However, pregnant cows had greater concentrations of progesterone on d 6, 9, and 10 post-AI (P < 0.01). The recovery rate was 55% and the length of recovered embryos (3.6 ± 0.9 vs. 2.4 ± 0.7 cm; P = 0.56) and IFN-τ concentration in the luminal uterine flushing (P = 0.44) were similar between treatments. In summary, the intrammamary infusion of LPS was able to trigger a systemic inflammatory response during post-AI period, but unable affect conceptus recovery and length, and intraluminal uterine IFN-t concentration.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.241
Teacher spread0.225 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Animal Science→Same topicReproductive Physiology in Livestock→French-language works237,207→