MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2554738025 · doi:10.1246/bcsj.20160316

The pH Dependent Protein Structure Transitions and Related Spin-State Transition of Cytochrome <i>c</i>′ from <i>Alcaligenes xylosoxidans</i> NCIMB 11015

2016· article· en· W2554738025 on OpenAlexaff
Akiko Takashina, Michael T. Tiedemann, Masaki Unno, Takahide Yamaguchi, Martin J. Stillman, Takamitsu Kohzuma

Bibliographic record

VenueBulletin of the Chemical Society of Japan · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicPhotosynthetic Processes and Mechanisms
Canadian institutionsWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsChemistryAlcaligenesCytochrome cCytochromeState (computer science)Transition (genetics)Chemical physicsPhotochemistryStereochemistryCrystallographyComputational chemistryBacteriaOrganic chemistryBiochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The unusual magnetic/spectroscopic properties of Cytochrome c′ (Cyt c′) have been discussed, especially concerning the possibility of a quantum mechanically mixed-spin configuration of heme Fe(III). Here, four unique-spin species were identified from the magnetic circular dichroism (MCD) spectra of Cyt c′ from Alcaligenes xylosoxidans (AxCyt c′). The electrospray ionization mass spectrometric (ESI-MS) and circular dichroism (CD) spectroscopic data showed the overall conformation of AxCyt c′ was unchanged, in complete contrast to the drastic changes in the heme MCD spectra over the range of pH 3.5 and 11.8. The pH dependency of ESI-MS, electronic absorption, MCD, and CD spectroscopic properties of AxCyt c′ enabled us to reveal the undiscovered correlation between the protein-folding state and the electronic structure of the active site as a function of pH. The mechanism of alkaline spin-state transition through the rearrangement of the hydrogen-bonding linkage between Helix C and D is also proposed on the basis of atomic resolution crystal structure analyses (A. Takashina, M. Unno, T. Kohzuma, Chem. Lett. 2015, 44, 268).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.329

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.003
GPT teacher head0.187
Teacher spread0.184 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBulletin of the Chemical Society of JapanSame topicPhotosynthetic Processes and MechanismsFrench-language works237,207