MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2554834566 · doi:10.1109/tpel.2016.2632442

Natural Sampling SVM-Based Common-Mode Voltage Reduction in Medium-Voltage Current Source Rectifier

2016· article· en· W2554834566 on OpenAlexaff
Qiang Wei, Bin Wu, Dewei Xu, Navid R. Zargari

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Power Electronics · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMultilevel Inverters and Converters
Canadian institutionsRockwell Automation (Canada)Toronto Metropolitan University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHarmonicsSpace vector modulationSupport vector machineReduction (mathematics)Rectifier (neural networks)VoltageControl theory (sociology)Harmonic analysisHarmonicComputer scienceElectronic engineeringEngineeringPulse-width modulationPhysicsMathematicsArtificial intelligenceAcousticsElectrical engineeringArtificial neural network

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Conventional space vector modulation (SVM)-based common-mode voltage (CMV) reduction in medium-voltage (MV) current source rectifier (CSR) cannot be used in practice. Conventional SVM contains high-magnitude low-order harmonics, particularly the fifth and seventh harmonics, that are lying closely to the resonance frequency (4.5-5.5 p.u.) of the LC filter of the converter, thus, introducing resonance as the grid-side damping is small. Recently, a natural sampling SVM (NS-SVM) with superior low-order harmonics performance has been proposed for MV CSR. On this basis, a NS-SVM-based CMV reduction method is proposed for MV CSR in this paper. The proposed scheme achieves both good CMV reduction and superior low-order harmonics performance simultaneously. Additionally, effort to lower computational burden on calculating dwell times is made. Experiments are finally provided.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.250
Teacher spread0.237 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations19
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Power ElectronicsSame topicMultilevel Inverters and ConvertersFrench-language works237,207