MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2554980028

Deconvolution of the Labrador Sea Transit-Time Distribution from Combined Measurements of CFC-11 and CFC-12

2016· article· en· W2554980028 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
P. Hsieh

Bibliographic record

VenueeScholarship (California Digital Library) · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicOceanographic and Atmospheric Processes
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDeconvolutionEnvironmental scienceHydrographyInterpolation (computer graphics)ClimatologyTransit (satellite)MeteorologyOceanographyGeologyGeographyStatisticsComputer scienceMathematics
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Labrador Sea is an important deep water formation site where a large fraction of theocean's deep waters had their last contact with the atmosphere. Consequently, quantifying the ventilation of the Labrador Sea is crucial for understanding the global ocean circulation. In this study, I use yearly hydrographic measurements of CFC-11 and CFC-12 conducted along WOCE repeat section AR7W from 1991 to 2009. I present improvements to previous application of Bayesian evidence framework to 3-dimensional interpolation of CFC-11, CFC-12, temperature and salinity data. The Bayesian evidence framework is also used to infer the Labrador Sea's climatological and interannual transit-time distribution (TTD) with a maximum entropy deconvolution method. We present improvements to the ventilation problem to allow for measurement errors and to better quantify the uncertainty in the estimated TTDs. These improvements include the introduction of an intrinsic correlation function to explicitly take into account correlations in adjacent portions of the TTD and the choice of hyperparameters in our model. Our results provide a baseline from which changes in theventilation of the Labrador Sea can be quantified.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.077
Threshold uncertainty score0.153

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.167
Teacher spread0.156 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueeScholarship (California Digital Library)Same topicOceanographic and Atmospheric ProcessesFrench-language works237,207