MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Prevention of Venous Thromboembolism (VTE) Associated with Pregnancy in Women with a Past History of VTE.

2009· article· en· W2555000332 on OpenAlexaff
Camilla Rozanski, Alejandro Lazo‐Langner, Michael J. Kovacs

Bibliographic record

VenueBlood · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicVenous Thromboembolism Diagnosis and Management
Canadian institutionsLondon Health Sciences CentreVictoria Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicinePregnancyWarfarinLow molecular weight heparinThrombosisRisk factorObstetricsVenous thrombosisVenous thromboembolismPostpartum periodPediatricsSurgeryInternal medicineAtrial fibrillation

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Abstract 3132 Poster Board III-69 Women with a past history of venous thrombosis are at higher risk for venous thromboembolism (VTE) during and after pregnancy. The highest risk period is the first four weeks post partum. For a woman whose previous event was secondary to a major transient risk factor the antepartum risk of recurrent VTE is low whereas for women whose previous event was idiopathic the antepartum risk is higher. In our institution, for women whose previous event was secondary to a major transient risk factor, standard treatment is to follow closely with no thromboprophylaxis antepartum and then receive either prophylactic low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) or warfarin for six weeks postpartum. For women whose previous event was idiopathic or who were on warfarin at the time of becoming pregnant they receive prophylactic LMWH antepartum with a scheduled delivery and are put back on warfarin if they have long term anticoagulation needs or LMWH for six weeks if they don't have longterm anticoagulation needs. We report the outcome for our patients from 1997 to 2008. All patients were followed for the duration of pregnancy and for 6 weeks postpartum for pregnancy outcome, recurrent VTE, and major bleeding in the thrombosis clinic of London Health Sciences Centre. There were a total of 90 women; 30 women (mean age 30.6 years) with a history of previous secondary thrombosis with 37 pregnancies and 60 women (mean age 29.5 years) with past idiopathic thrombosis with 99 pregnancies. For the secondary group there was 1 episode (2.70%; 95% CI 0.48-13.82) of antepartum recurrent VTE whereas for the idiopathic group there were 3 episodes (3.03%; 95% CI 1.04-8.53). There was no statistical difference between groups (p=1.0). There were no episodes of postpartum VTE recurrence or major hemorrhage for either group. For the secondary group there was 1 fetal loss at 23 weeks (2.7%; 95% CI 0.48-13.82) whereas for the idiopathic group there were 6 fetal losses at 8, 10, 10, 11, 22, 37 weeks gestation (6.06%; 95% CI 2.81-12.60). There was no statistically significant difference between groups (p=0.77). This retrospective review suggests that for pregnant women with a past history of VTE, a strategy of no antepartum prophylaxis for previous secondary thrombosis and antepartum prophylactic LMWH for previous idiopathic thrombosis as well as prophylactic LMWH or warfarin postpartum is efficacious and safe. Disclosures Off Label Use: low molecular weight heparin for prevention of VTE in pregnancy.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.224
Teacher spread0.213 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBlood→Same topicVenous Thromboembolism Diagnosis and Management→French-language works237,207→