MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Long-Term Follow-Up Results of Adults with T-Cell Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia (T-ALL)-The Vancouver Experience.

2005· article· en· W2555070547 on OpenAlexaffabout
Yasser R. Abou Mourad, Stephen H. Nantel, Cynthia L. Toze, Thomas J. Nevill, Michael J. Barnett, Donna L. Forrest, Donna E. Hogge, Julye C. Lavoie, John D. Shepherd, Heather J. Sutherland, Clayton Smith, Kevin Song

Bibliographic record

VenueBlood · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAcute Lymphoblastic Leukemia research
Canadian institutionsVancouver General Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineVincristineCytarabineCyclophosphamideInternal medicineGastroenterologyChemotherapyInduction chemotherapyAcute lymphocytic leukemiaSurgeryChemotherapy regimenPrednisoneRegimenLeukemiaLymphoblastic Leukemia

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (T-ALL) is a rare disease accounting for approximately 20–25% of adult cases of ALL. The outcome of adult T-ALL has improved in the past decades, but relapse remains the major cause of treatment failure. Few studies have reported on the long-term outcome of adults with T-ALL. We retrospectively reviewed the charts of 39 adult patients (pts) diagnosed with T-ALL and treated at our center between August 1986 and April 2004. Characteristics: Male/female ratio was 3.3/1. Median age was 28.4 years (16.8–73.2). ECOG PS: 0/1(n=27), ≥ 2 (n=12). Median WBC at diagnosis was 12.2 (0.9–445), Platelets 60.7 (6–270), LDH <2 x normal (n= 14), ≥ 2 x normal (n=23), unknown (n=2). CSF was involved in 7/39 pts, splenomegaly found in 13/39, mediastinal mass in 16/39 and lymphadenopathy in 16/39 pts. 36/39 pts received a consistent induction chemotherapy regimen consisting of prednisone, vincristine and daunorubicin ± L-asparaginase. A second phase of induction comprised of cyclophosphamide, cytarabine, methotrexate and mercaptopurine. Intensification was with dexamethasone, vincristine, daunorubicin, cyclophosphamide, cytarabine and thioguanine. Four cycles of consolidation with cytarabine and tenoposide were given. 30/39 pts (77%) achieved complete remission with induction chemotherapy. 1 patients died during induction chemotherapy secondary to disseminated aspergillosis, 2 patient during consolidation secondary to cerebral edema and aspergillosis. 8/30 pts proceeded to allogeneic BMT in CR1(4/8 due to high WBC>150, 3/8 MRD availability,1/8 in CR1 after salvage chemotherapy) of whom two pts died due to aGVHD and infection after transplantation. 8 pts had refractory disease; Only 1/8 achieved CR on salvage chemotherapy. 16/30 (53%) relapsed of whom 12/16 (75%) died of disease progression, 1 died of sepsis in CR2 and 3 pts alive in CR2. Median follow up of the 15 surviving patients is 59 months (1.5–183.4). Results: Overall survival (OS) and event-free survival (EFS) at 3 years for all patients were 33.7% (95% CI 19–49%) and 28% (95% CI 13–43%) respectively. Using univariate analysis, significant factors for poor survival were CSF involvement: [3-year EFS was 14% vs 34% (p = 0.05)], LDH levels higher than 2 times normal [3-year EFS was 7% vs 43.5% (p = 0.005)] and ECOG PS ≥2: [3-year EFS was 16.6% vs 37% (p = 0.05)]. Non-significant factors included sex, age < 30 vs 30–55, presence of mediastinal mass, lymphadenopathy, splenomegaly, WBC > 50. Conclusions: Adult T-ALL presents more commonly in young males with a third having a mediastinal mass. The outcome of treatment results in a 30% long term disease free survival. Patients refractory to induction as well as those who relapse have poor prognosis. As expected poor PS, high LDH and CSF involvement dictates worse outcome. Neither age, nor high WBC count contributed to worse prognosis.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.031
Threshold uncertainty score0.063

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.256
Teacher spread0.245 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2005
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBloodSame topicAcute Lymphoblastic Leukemia researchFrench-language works237,207