MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2555088315 · doi:10.1109/itmc.2005.7461292

Collaboration in the next generation manufacturing: Critical analysis of recent technology foresight projects and research framework

2005· article· en· W2555088315 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Marco Taisch, M. Montorio

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicDiverse academic and cultural studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNunavut General Monitoring Plan
KeywordsFutures studiesContext (archaeology)Delphi methodDelphiProduction (economics)StakeholderField (mathematics)Work (physics)ConstructiveComputer scienceManagement scienceKnowledge managementProcess managementEngineering managementEngineeringManagementProcess (computing)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The paper introduces the research work carried on in the last two years within the Department of Management, Economics and Industrial Engineering of the Politecnico di Milano (POLIMI-DIG), which intends to investigate the new strategic production paradigms emerging from the wide adoption of ICT applications in a global manufacturing context. External environmental conditions, market pressures, stakeholder expectations, internal pressures and new strategic paradigms are analysed. The final goal will be the creation of a roadmap to the next generation of production systems. The investigation will rely on several on-field research approaches: investigations and critical analysis on recent and ongoing technology foresight projects, expert panels, Delphi studies, surveys and scenario planning techniques. Here in the followings an introduction of the research framework is given with the intent to stimulate a constructive discussion on it.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.792
Threshold uncertainty score0.229

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.233
GPT teacher head0.365
Teacher spread0.132 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicDiverse academic and cultural studiesFrench-language works237,207