MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2555089337 · doi:10.1109/iecon.2015.7392951

Standalone DC level-1 EV Charging using pv/Grid infrastructure, MPPT algorithm and CHAdeMO protocol

2015· article· en· W2555089337 on OpenAlexaff
Vamsi Krishna Pathipati, Najath Abdul Azeez, Sheldon S. Williamson

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Battery Technologies Research
Canadian institutionsOntario Tech University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhotovoltaic systemCharge controllerComputer scienceMaximum power point trackingAutomotive engineeringElectrical engineeringElectric vehicleBattery (electricity)GridSolar energyAlgorithmState of chargeVoltagePower (physics)EngineeringPhysicsMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper presents an approach of DC level 1 charging of an electric vehicle (EV) or plug-in hybrid electric vehicle (PHEV) making use of standalone solar photovoltaic (PV) system. In this approach it is proposed to use the DC power generated by solar panels to directly charge EV traction battery pack using solar MPPT controller algorithm and CHAdeMO DC fast charging protocol. A supervisory control algorithm is developed to handle the standalone solar conditions. With the proposed solution, any EV users with CHAdeMO DC fast charging port can charge their vehicle. An example of commercially available EV `Nissan Leaf' is considered for explaining the solution with 1 kW solar PV system. An average daily commuter distance is considered along with the survey data of different demographic solar energy harvesting capability. Calculations are made to prove that this solution can charge EVs off-the-grid, hence zero running cost.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.064
GPT teacher head0.325
Teacher spread0.261 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations11
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAdvanced Battery Technologies ResearchFrench-language works237,207