MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2555123112 · doi:10.1139/tcsme-2009-0020

A TIME-PHASED PRODUCTION SCHEDULING SYSTEM FOR MULTIPLE ORDER WITH SINGLE ITEM

2009· article· en· W2555123112 on OpenAlex
Chun‐Hsiung Lan, Kuo-Chien Liu

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueTransactions of the Canadian Society for Mechanical Engineering · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicScheduling and Optimization Algorithms
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceProduction (economics)Scheduling (production processes)Production scheduleWorkstationMathematical optimizationProduction rateScheduleProduction costAlgorithmReal-time computingIndustrial engineeringMathematicsEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A mathematical model which minimizes the production cost of an automatic and networktype multiple-order-production (MOP) system with restriction of time-phased order completion is presented. A step-by-step algorithm is described to find the minimal cost of production. In order to solve the combinatorial problems of the production rate, the machine cost, and numerous machines in parallel at each workstation of the production line, a feedback approach is also applied in the algorithm. An example of a large number of orders which is subdivided into different deadlines is shown to demonstrate the application of the algorithm that results in decreased production cost, enhanced production rate, improved efficiency of the production schedule, and on-time completion of production.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.655
Threshold uncertainty score0.558

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.186
Teacher spread0.177 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it