MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2555155333

만성위염 환자들과 위궤양 환자들 간의 스트레스반응, 분노표현 및 감정표현불능증의 비교

2004· article· ko· W2555155333 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
고경봉, 오승준, 이상인, 정재복

Bibliographic record

Venue精神身體醫學 = Korean journal of psychosomatic medicine · 2004
Typearticle
Languageko
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicPsychosocial Factors Impacting Youth
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSomatizationAlexithymiaAngerHostilityAnxietyToronto Alexithymia ScaleInternal medicineChronic gastritisMedicineClinical psychologySymptom Checklist 90GastroenterologyGastritisDepression (economics)PsychiatryPsychologyStomach
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

연구목적: 본 연구는 만성표재성 위염 환자들과 위궤양 환자들을 대상으로 두 환자군 간의 스트레스반응, 분노표현, 감정표현불능증을 비교하기 위해 시행되었다. 방 법: 대상은 소화기내과에 내원한 후 위내시경을 시행하여 만성표재성위염으로 확인된 환자 100명과 위궤양으로 확인된 환자 40명으로 구성되었다. 스트레스반응은 스트레스반응척도 및 Symptom Checklist-90-revised의 불안, 우울, 신체화, 적대감 하위척도에 의해, 분노표현은 분노표현척도에 의해, 감정표현불능증은 Toronto Alexithymia Scale에 의해 각각 평가되었다. 결 과: 만성위염 환자들이 위궤양 환자들보다 스트레스반응척도의 긴장 하위척도 및 신체화 하위척도 점수와 SCL-90-R의 불안 하위척도 점수가 각각 유의하게 더 높았다. 그러나 분노표현 하위척도 및 분노억제 하위척도 점수와 감정표현불능증 전체점수는 2군 간에 각각 유의한 차이를 보이지 않았다. 스트레스반응척도의 신체화 하위척도 점수는 만성위염 환자들에서 여자가 남자보다, 위궤양 환자들에서는 남자가 여자보다 각각 유의하게 더 높았다. 결 론: 이상의 결과들은 만성위염 환자들이 위궤양 환자들에 비해 스트레스반응이 더 현저하고 스트레스에 대한 취약성이 더 높을 가능성을 시사해 준다. 그리고 만성위염 환자들은 여자들에서, 위궤양 환자들은 남자들에서 신체화 경향이 더 높음을 시사한다. 그러나 두 군 간에 분노표현 및 분노억압, 감정표현불능증은 차이를 보이지 않았다. 【The objective of this study was to make a comparison between chronic superficial gastritis and gastric ulcer patients regarding stress responses, anger expression and alexithymia. The subjects included 100 patients with chronic superficial gastritis and 40 patients with gastric ulcer confirmed by gastroscopy. Stress responses were measured by the Stress Response Inventory(SRI) and anxiety, depression, somatization and hostility subscales of the Symptom Checklist-90-revised(SCL-90-R). Anger expression and anger suppression were assessed by the Anger Expression Scale. The level of alexithymia was assessed by the Toronto Alexithymia Scale(TAS). Multiple regression analysis showed that the patients with chronic gastritis scored significantly higher on tension subscale and somatization subscale of the SRI, and anxiety subscale of the SCL-90-R than those with gastric ulcer. However, no significant differences were found in the score of anger expression and anger suppression subscales and total score of TAS between the two groups. In chronic gastritis patients, women scored significantly higher on somatization subscale of the SRI than men, whereas in gastric ulcer patients, men scored significantly higher on somatization subscale of the SRI than women. These results suggest that chronic gastritis patients are more likely to have higher level of stress responses and higher susceptibility to stress than gastric ulcer patients. In addition, in chronic gastritis patients, women are more likely to somatize than men, but in gastric ulcer patients, men are more likely to somatize than women. However, there were no differences between the two groups in anger expression, anger suppression and alexithymia.】

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.043
GPT teacher head0.360
Teacher spread0.317 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venue精神身體醫學 = Korean journal of psychosomatic medicineSame topicPsychosocial Factors Impacting YouthFrench-language works237,207