<i>Il viaggiatore sedentario</i> (1993) e <i>Città e dintorni</i> (2001): sensibilità postmoderna e etica ambientale in due testi odeporici di Luigi Malerba
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In questo saggio si vogliono prendere in disamina due testi di Luigi Malerba: Il viaggiatore sedentario (1993) e Città e dintorni (2001). Questi testi odeporici raccontano i viaggi di Malerba in Cina, Thailandia, Europa, Nord America, Grecia e Asia Minore e raccolgono le riflessioni dell’autore nate e rielaborate lungo un ampio arco di tempo. Grazie al supporto teorico offerto dal lavoro di studiosi quali Serenella Iovino, Serpil Oppermann, Ursula Heise e Rob Nixon, quest’articolo evidenzia la sensibilità postmoderna di Malerba verso l’ambiente e la sua maestria nel raffigurare il rapporto complementare esistente tra l’essere umano e la natura, tra l’umano e il non-umano. Dalle pagine di questi testi odeporici emerge, con forza, la figura di un uomo sensibile, intelligente, curioso, ironico e attento alle storie di tutti quegli esseri ignoti di passaggio sul pianeta Terra. Le osservazioni di Malerba non cadono mai in localismo nostalgico e tantomeno in “utopia regressiva” (Parole al vento 230). L’autore, invece, mostra rispetto e premura per ogni luogo, abitazione, cultura e popolo con cui entra in contatto nei sui numerosi viaggi a “zig-zag” (Viaggiatore 8) sempre fatti in compagnia della moglie Anna Lapenna.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.006 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.005 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Research integrity | 0.005 | 0.005 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.025 | 0.007 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".