MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2555410598 · doi:10.1182/blood.v118.21.26.26

Indoleamine 2,3-Dioxygenase and Peripheral Tolerance to Exogenous Factor VIII: A Multi-Centre Pilot Study

2011· article· en· W2555410598 on OpenAlexaff
Davide Matino, Alfonso Iorio, Marco Gargaro, Giuseppe Tagariello, Matteo Luciani, Giovanni Di Minno, Antonio Coppola, Leonardo Di Gennaro, Paolo Puccetti, Francesca Fallarino

Bibliographic record

VenueBlood · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHemophilia Treatment and Research
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsImmunologyImmune tolerancePeripheral toleranceMedicineIndoleamine 2,3-dioxygenaseImmune systemPeripheral blood mononuclear cellAntibodyBiologyIn vitro

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Abstract 26 Introduction: Clinically relevant antibodies neutralizing the hemostatic effect of fVIII occur in approximately 20–25% of patients with hemophilia A on replacement therapy, and they are associated with significant mortality, morbidity, and a poorer life quality. Many factors predisposing to inhibitor formation have been advocated, but the reasons why some patients develop a neutralizing antibody response to FVIII remains unclear. Evidence suggests that hemophilia-associated mutations (resulting in the absence or severe truncation of the FVIII protein) are associated with the highest risk of inhibitor formation on replacement therapy, as those mutations may have prevented the early development of physiologic tolerance to human fVIII. Recent evidence suggests a role for professional antigen-presenting cells (APC) in the initiation of immunogenic versus tolerogenic responses to fVIII. In particular dendritic cells (DC) actively establish and maintain both central and peripheral tolerance to self. Several mechanisms contribute to DC tolerogenicity and the tryptophan catabolic pathway involving indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase (IDO) may be at work. IDO is responsible for multiple regulatory effects on immune cells, including inhibition of activated T and B cell proliferation, apoptosis, and lymphocyte differentiation towards T or B cell regulatory phenotypes. The role of IDO and tryptophan catabolytes in immunoreactivity versus tolerance to self prompted us to investigate whether IDO has a role in peripheral tolerance to exogenous fVIII. Objectives: The goal of this multi-centre study was to examine IDO expression and function in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) from hemophilic subjects to test the hypothesis that IDO is involved in the modulation of fVIII-specific responses and, particularly, that inhibitor-positive patients might have impaired IDO induction/activity and therefore higher propensity to develop anti-fVIII responses. Methods: Blood was collected from 21 severe (<0.01 IU/mL) hemophilia A patients who provided written informed consent and consisted of 9 inhibitor-positive patients (≥5 Bethesda Units) and 12 inhibitor-free patients (with undetectable inhibitor levels). PBMC were isolated by Ficoll-Paque Plus gradient centrifugation with standard procedures. IDO induction in PBMC was assessed by immunoblot analysis (WB) and Real-Time PCR (mRNA), while IDO activity was analyzed through HPLC evaluation of kynurenine production (the first breakdown product of tryptophan catabolism by IDO). Results: 11 out of 12 patients without inhibitor displayed normal IDO expression and function, while only 1 out of 9 patients with inhibitor had unimpaired IDO competence. Consistent results were obtained by i) immunoblot analysis of protein expression (densitometry units; inhibitor-positive patients, 0.78 ± 0.57; inhibitor-free patients 4.52 ± 2.9; p = 0.002), by ii) RT-PCR for IDO mRNA (mRNA fold change over control; inhibitor-positive patients 1.11 ± 0.54; inhibitor-free patients 3.18 ± 1.85; p = 0.007), and by iii) kynurenine production (kynurenine fold change over control; inhibitor-positive patients 0.86 ± 0.34; inhibitor-free patients 2.3 ± 0.87; p = 0.0002) (fig.1). Conclusions: These preliminary data show that the immunoregulatory enzyme IDO could be involved in peripheral tolerance to factor VIII. Studies with a larger number of patients (combined with studies of IDO gene polymorphism) and the implementation of suitable animal models (currently underway in our laboratory) might yield further insight into any possible relationships between defective IDO function and inhibitor development in hemophilic patients. Ultimately, the level of IDO expression could represent an additional prognostic factor in hemophilic patients on replacement therapy when combined with fVIII gene mutation (high- vs. low- risk) assessment and, possibly, HLA class II molecule expression profiling. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Non-randomized trial · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.013

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.087
GPT teacher head0.302
Teacher spread0.215 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNon-randomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBlood→Same topicHemophilia Treatment and Research→French-language works237,207→