MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2555580606 · doi:10.1109/pesgm.2016.7741187

Whether to charge an electric vehicle or not? A near-optimal online approach

2016· article· en· W2555580606 on OpenAlexafffund
Ruilong Deng, Hao Liang

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicSmart Grid Energy Management
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersAlberta Innovates - Technology Futures
KeywordsComputer scienceOnline algorithmA priori and a posterioriCompetitive analysisMarkov decision processScheduling (production processes)Electric vehicleSmart gridElectricityJob shop schedulingMarkov processMarkov chainGridMathematical optimizationUpper and lower boundsOperations researchReal-time computingScheduleEngineeringAlgorithm

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The electric vehicle (EV), a promising technique to reduce transportation emissions, is one of the most important household appliances for demand response. Under the real-time pricing environment in smart grid, EV owners are faced with the EV charging scheduling problem to minimize electricity cost. Existing works focused on offline solutions or Markov decision processes which require full or statistical priori knowledge of future real-time prices (RTPs). This may not be practical as it is difficult to predict future RTPs especially for long horizons. In this paper, we propose a near-optimal online algorithm via primal-dual approach, requiring very little priori knowledge, i.e., the upper bound of future RTPs. The competitive ratio of the online algorithm is derived. It is demonstrated with real price data from Ameren Corporation that our proposed online algorithm can result in considerable economic savings, compared with existing schemes which only consider RTPs.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.278
Threshold uncertainty score0.996

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.221
Teacher spread0.203 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations15
Published2016
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicSmart Grid Energy ManagementFrench-language works237,207