Stochastic high‐order internal model‐based adaptive TILC with random uncertainties in initial states and desired reference points
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Summary Many practical batch processes operate repetitively in industry and lack intermediate measurements for the interested process variables. Moreover, the initial states as well as the desired product objective often vary with different runs because of the existence of many uncertainties in practice. This work proposes a novel adaptive terminal iterative learning control method to deal with random uncertainties in desired terminal points and initial states. The run‐varying initial states are formulated by a stochastic high‐order internal model, which is further incorporated into the controller design. The desired terminal output is run dependent and is directly compensated like a feedback term in the controller. Only the system output at the endpoint of an operation is utilized to update the control signal. An estimation algorithm is designed to update the system Markov parameters as a whole. No explicit model information is involved in the controller design; thus, the proposed method is data driven and can be applied to nonlinear systems directly. Both the theoretical analysis and the simulation studies demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed approach under random initial states and iteration‐varying referenced terminal points. Copyright © 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it