Electrode Stack Geometry Changes during Gas Evolution in Pouch-Cell-Type Lithium Ion Batteries
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Safety remains a significant concern for the lithium-ion battery industry, despite over twenty five years of development since their commercial introduction [R. Spotnitz and J. Franklin, J. Power Sources, 113, 81, (2003)]. Many abusive conditions (such as overheating, overcharge, overdischarge, and electrical short) can give rise to gas evolution in lithium ion batteries, which causes increased pressure and/or expansion of the cell leading to changes in the electrode geometry that can lead to significantly different electrochemical performance and safety characteristics [Y. Qi, S. S. J. Harris, J. Electrochem. Soc., 157, A741 (2010)]. In order to characterize the cell-level changes that occur during gas evolution, a non-destructive technique is required that can image the internal components of the cell at high spatial resolution without perturbing the electrode assembly itself. This paper demonstrates the use of synchrotron-based computed tomography to characterize the changes in electrode geometry that occur during gas evolution in a commercial aluminum pouch cell.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".