MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2555769203

The forensic biometric analysis of emotions from facial expressions, and physiological processes from the heart and skin

2016· article· en· W2555769203 on OpenAlexaff
Azeza Al Masri, Shashi K. Jasra

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicDeception detection and forensic psychology
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Windsor
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFacial expressionEmotion recognitionArousalValence (chemistry)PsychologyPerceptionBiometricsFacial electromyographyCognitive psychologySkin conductanceEmotional expressionComputer scienceCommunicationSocial psychologyArtificial intelligenceMedicineNeuroscience
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Decision-making, perception, memory and social interactions are greatly driven by emotion. Emotions can be measured from facial expressions through the facial muscles. A group of four students were exposed to emotionally loaded stimuli (videos and images) in its full complexity to assess the valence of the emotional expression, the associated arousal, skin respiration and the heart rate. The i-Motions software has the capability to detect voluntary as well as involuntary physiological responses of the different individuals. The responses of the participants when shown different stimuli were personalized. The software has great potential in the forensic sciences for analyzing the responses.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.048
GPT teacher head0.331
Teacher spread0.283 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicDeception detection and forensic psychologyFrench-language works237,207