MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2555788952

A Community Outreach Blood Pressure Clinic: Experiential practice site for pharmacy and dental hygiene students trained in physical assessment

2016· article· en· W2555788952 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenuePharmacy Education · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicInnovations in Medical Education
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Manitoba
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPharmacyMedicineLikert scaleExperiential learningOutreachFamily medicineCommunity pharmacyReading (process)FeelingPharmacy practiceNursingPhysical therapyPsychologyPedagogy
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: The application of skills in physical assessment is recognised as an important part of providing pharmaceutical care. However, the number of quality experiential opportunities for pharmacy students to practice these skills is currently limited. Objective: To describe the implementation and evaluation of a Community Outreach Blood Pressure Clinic for pharmacy and dental hygiene students. Procedures: Three blood pressure clinics were designed to provide a unique learning environment for pharmacy and dental hygiene students to practice their skills in physical assessment. A 5-point Likert scale and open comments were used to measure student’s confidence, comfort, and knowledge on performing a blood pressure reading on a patient. To evaluate the impact of the clinic on the community, participant satisfaction and the proportion of individuals who have not had a blood pressure reading in the previous year were also captured. Results: All participants reported being satisfied or very satisfied about the blood pressure clinic. Among the participants, 18 (56%), 19 (35%), and 30 (54%) did not recall or know what their typical blood pressure reading was at the College of Pharmacy, Community Centre, and Residential Home, respectively. The percentage of students that agreed or strongly agreed to feeling confident (44/46 or 96% vs. 12/18 or 67%, p <0.05), comfortable (44/46 or 96% vs. 13/18 or 72%, p <0.05), and knowledgeable (45/46 or 98% vs. 14/18 or 79%, p <0.05) about performing a physical assessment of vitals on a patient was higher after the experiential site than after the online module, respectively. No differences in responses between pharmacy and dental hygiene students were observed. Conclusions: This study suggests that a Community Outreach Blood Pressure Clinic provided a satisfactory experience for students to apply their skills in performing a blood pressure reading and assessment. Student reported confidence was improved after the experiential exposure compared to the practice lab and online module. Findings from this study will be used to improve existing experiential programs related to the advancement of skills in physical assessment.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.415
Threshold uncertainty score0.602

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.047
GPT teacher head0.506
Teacher spread0.459 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it