MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2555987626 · doi:10.1109/pesgm.2016.7741207

Modeling and optimal operation of a university campus microgrid

2016· article· en· W2555987626 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMicrogrid Control and Optimization
Canadian institutionsÉcole de Technologie Supérieure
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMicrogridPhotovoltaic systemComputer scienceRelation (database)Control (management)University campusOptimal designReliability engineeringControl engineeringAutomotive engineeringOperations researchEngineeringElectrical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, we propose a system design for a university campus microgrid (UCM) to facilitate research needs in relation to the operation and control of microgrid. This paper proposes the design, modeling and optimal operation of a UCM. The optimal operation aims to minimize the operation costs of photovoltaic system and costs of exchange with the local electrical network. The UCM is aggregating different distributed energy resources with parts of local loads that are co-located in the campus setting. The mathematical modeling of different components of the UCM is proposed. However, the objective of the UCM is to achieve three objectives: 1) to satisfy part of the residential campus loads, 2) to charge employees electric vehicles and 3) to help the campus avoiding peak load in period of high demands.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.567
Threshold uncertainty score0.104

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.003
GPT teacher head0.147
Teacher spread0.144 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations20
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicMicrogrid Control and OptimizationFrench-language works237,207