MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2556045183 · doi:10.30684/etj.28.11.4

ANN Modified Design Model to Adjust Field Current of D.C. Motor

2010· article· en· W2556045183 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueEngineering and Technology Journal · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicNeural Networks and Applications
Canadian institutionsGeomechanica (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsArtificial neural networkController (irrigation)MATLABComputer scienceControl engineeringDC motorControl theory (sociology)Field (mathematics)Feed forwardConstant (computer programming)Control (management)Artificial intelligenceEngineeringMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This work is concerned with designing an adjusted field current of D.C.motors to obtain constant speed, based on ANN. The design is employed by usingtraining model with supervised manner with back-propagation algorithm.MATLAB neural network tool box is used for training purpose.The feed-forward neural network (FFNN) and learning capabilities offers apromising way to solve the problem of system non-linearity, parameter variationson unexpected load excisions associated with D.C. motor drive system.The proposed ANN controller model is implemented with a control dc motordrive system in the laboratory. The laboratory test results validate the efficacy ofthe based controller model for a high performance dc motor drive.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.754
Threshold uncertainty score0.213

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.238
Teacher spread0.222 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it