MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2556102239 · doi:10.4000/caliban.972

"With Robert, Xavier and Elijah in Flanders": Re-Examining Timothy Findley’s The Wars (1977) and its Literary Legacy

2015· article· en· W2556102239 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Corinne Bigot

Bibliographic record

VenueCaliban · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCanadian Identity and History
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesEthnologyArtStress (linguistics)HistoryPhilosophyLinguistics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Cet article s’intéresse aux stratégies déployées par l’écrivain canadien Timothy Findley dans son roman The Wars (1977) pour, d’une part, remettre en cause les versions officielles de la Grande Guerre et des guerres, ainsi que les versions idéalisées qu’elles ont suscitées, et d’autre part, tracer des parallèles entre le champ de bataille des Flandres et le Canada. Ces stratégies sont lues en regard des stratégies mises en œuvre par un écrivain canadien, Joseph Boyden, dans Three Day Road (2005), roman qui atteste de l’importance de The Wars, et qui, lui aussi, transporte la Guerre vers le Canada pour opérer un décentrement de l’histoire en mettant l’accent sur l’expérience personnelle et celle des individus marginalisés.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.805
Threshold uncertainty score0.950

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.038
GPT teacher head0.251
Teacher spread0.213 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCalibanSame topicCanadian Identity and HistoryFrench-language works237,207