MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2556365973 · doi:10.1109/tnb.2016.2628403

Rapid Detection of Protein Kinase on Capacitive Sensing Platforms

2016· article· en· W2556365973 on OpenAlexaff
Rohit Chand, Dawoon Han, Yong‐Sang Kim

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on NanoBioscience · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicAdvanced biosensing and bioanalysis techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Guelph
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAptamerCapacitive sensingCapacitanceMaterials scienceDetection limitAnalyteBiosensorMonolayerOptoelectronicsSemiconductorISFETTransistorNanotechnologyVoltageChemistryComputer scienceField-effect transistorElectrical engineeringElectrodeChromatography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this study, we developed a capacitive sensor for the one-step and label-free detection of protein kinase A (PKA) enzyme. Metal-insulator-semiconductor (MIS) and electrolyte-insulator-semiconductor (EIS) are a simple electronic transducer, which allows efficient detection of the target analyte. For this reason, we performed a comparative sensing of PKA on the MIS and EIS capacitive sensor. The PKA-specific aptamer was used for the one-step detection. For the immobilization of thiolated aptamer, the MIS sensor contained a thin gold layer, whereas the EIS sensor had a self-aligned monolayer of gold nanoparticles. The interaction of aptamer and PKA changed the charge and density of the sensor surface. The quantitative detection of PKA was performed by analyzing the capacitance-voltage curve after the aptamer-PKA interaction. The MIS and EIS sensor showed a detection limit of 5 U/mL and 1 U/mL, respectively, for the detection of PKA. This study suggests valuable sensing platforms for the rapid and sensitive biochemical diagnosis.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.240
Teacher spread0.228 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on NanoBioscienceSame topicAdvanced biosensing and bioanalysis techniquesFrench-language works237,207