MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2556369833

Translation of Canadian Female Authors in Croatia

2012· article· en· W2556369833 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Mirna Sindičić Sabljo, Petra Sapun Kurtin

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicTranslation Studies and Practices
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPublishingPoetryContext (archaeology)HistorySelection (genetic algorithm)CroatianLiterary translationLinguisticsLiteratureArtComputer scienceArtificial intelligence
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The paper focuses on translated titles of Canadian women writing in Croatia, taking into consideration translations from English and French language, primarily translations published in books, anthologies and literary magazines, but also volumes of poetry and other genres. The findings of our research include the search for patterns that occur in translation of specific works and authors, as well as determining which authors and literary genres have been translated most frequently, what the (inter)national publishing and specific cultural context was at the time of publication of individual works, and what circumstances might have influenced the selection of particular Canadian women authors for translation. They were first translated into Croatian in 1970s, but the majority of works were published in the past two decades, and especially in the past ten years.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.007
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.216
Threshold uncertainty score0.434

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.007
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0080.012
Science and technology studies0.0110.003
Scholarly communication0.0050.001
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0090.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.136
GPT teacher head0.287
Teacher spread0.151 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicTranslation Studies and Practices→French-language works237,207→