MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2556418416 · doi:10.18849/ve.v1i4.70

Building a Business Case for EBVM

2016· article· en· W2556418416 on OpenAlexaff
Elizabeth Jackson, Sarah Hauser

Bibliographic record

VenueVeterinary Evidence · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicCommunity Development and Social Impact
Canadian institutionsRoyal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIconArtLibrary scienceComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

<p>The clinical benefits of EBVM are clear however the business case for EBVM requires development. We aim to expand the adoption of EBVM amongst UK veterinary practices by identifying its improvement to practice performance...</p><p>This is a podcast of Elizabeth Jackson and Sarah Hauser’s talk at the Veterinary Evidence Today conference, Edinburgh November 2, 2016.</p><p> </p><p><a title="Jackson and Hauser's podcast" href="/index.php/ve/article/view/70/92" target="_self"><img src="/public/site/images/bridget/Elizabeth-Jackson--Sarah-Hauser-audioplayer.png" alt="" /></a></p><br /> <img src="https://www.veterinaryevidence.org/rcvskmod/icons/oa-icon.jpg" alt="Open Access" />

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.524
Threshold uncertainty score0.380

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.257
GPT teacher head0.341
Teacher spread0.084 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueVeterinary EvidenceSame topicCommunity Development and Social ImpactFrench-language works237,207