MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2556505722 · doi:10.1111/nzg.12134

The Rotoroa Island and Auckland Zoo partnership: Connecting heterotopic spaces

2016· article· en· W2556505722 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueNew Zealand Geographer · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicSpatial and Cultural Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsArchipelagoHeterotopia (medicine)General partnershipGeographyInterpretation (philosophy)Space (punctuation)Literal (mathematical logic)ArchaeologyPolitical scienceBiologyPhilosophyLinguisticsLaw

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In partnership, Rotoroa Island and Auckland Zoo in the Hauraki Gulf have established a conservation sanctuary that has linked a literal sea‐bound island with an urban and metaphorical island. Each entity (Rotoroa and the Zoo) has a presence in each other's space. Ideas of archipelago as well as Foucault's heterotopia assist our interpretation of these developments as expressed in the observed landscape, policy documents and media sources. We conclude that an interpenetration of influences is enabling a diverse set of experiences within the controlled bounds of two intensely managed and insular spaces.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.872
Threshold uncertainty score0.997

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.276
Teacher spread0.258 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it