MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Abstract 18449: Apolipoprotein B/Apolipoprotein A-I Ratio and Progression of Aortic Valve Stenosis - Results From the PROGRESSA Study

2015· article· en· W2556585857 on OpenAlexaff
Lionel Tastet, Romain Capoulade, Mylène Shen, Abdellaziz Dahou, Marie‐Annick Clavel, Patrick Mathieu, Marie Arsenault, Élisabeth Bédard, J. Dumesnil, Jean‐Pierre Després, Philippe Pîbarot

Bibliographic record

VenueCirculation · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAortic Thrombus and Embolism
Canadian institutionsInstitut national de psychiatrie légale Philippe-PinelUniversité LavalCollège Lionel Groulx
Fundersnot available
KeywordsApolipoprotein BMedicineInternal medicineCardiologyStenosisCohortCholesterol

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction: Calcific aortic stenosis (AS) is an active and complex disorder, which involves atherosclerotic-like processes. However, previous studies reported that the association between atherosclerotic risk factors and AS progression appears to be stronger in younger middle-aged patients compared to elderly ones. Hypothesis: Apolipoprotein B/apolipoprotein A-I (apoB/apoA-I) ratio reflects the balance between proatherogenic versus antiatherogenic lipid profile. The objective of this study was to examine the association between apoB/apoA-I ratio and progression of AS according to patient’s age. Methods: One hundred sixty five patients with AS were prospectively recruited in the PROGRESSA study. AS progression was assessed by increase in peak aortic jet velocity (Vpeak) measured by Doppler echocardiography between baseline and 2-year follow-up. Blood samples were collected to measure plasma levels of apoB and apoA-I. Results: The mean age was 66±13 years and 72% were male. During the 2-year follow-up, AS progression was similar in younger patients (age <69 y.o. [median age for the whole cohort]; n=82) and older patients (Vpeak: +0.24±0.04 vs +0.25±0.03 m/s; p=0.82). There was a significant interaction (p<0.01) between patient’s age and baseline apoB/apoA-I ratio for AS progression. Younger patients with high baseline apoB/apoA-I ratio (i.e. apoB/apoA-I ≥0.53; n=41) had faster AS progression compared to those with lower apoB/apoA-I ratio (Vpeak: +0.32±0.06 vs +0.16±0.04 m/s; p=0.03). In older patients, there was no significant association between apoB/apoA-I ratio and AS progression (Vpeak: +0.23±0.05 vs +0.27±0.04 m/s; p=0.55). After adjustment for sex, hypertension, dyslipidemia, diabetes, metabolic syndrome, creatinine level, degree of aortic valve calcification and baseline Vpeak, higher apoB/apoA-I ratio remained independently associated with faster progression of AS in younger patients (p=0.003). Conclusions: This prospective study shows for the first time that higher apoB/apoA-I ratio is a powerful and independent predictor of faster AS progression in younger patients. These findings suggest that the pathological processes involved in the progression of AS are different in younger versus older patients.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.230
Threshold uncertainty score0.471

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.049
GPT teacher head0.318
Teacher spread0.268 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCirculationSame topicAortic Thrombus and EmbolismFrench-language works237,207