MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

A Novel Perspective On Hematopoietic Stem/Progenitor Cell Homing - an Expanding Family of Bone Marrow Homing Factors That Can Support SDF-1-Mediated Homing or Even Replace SDF-1

2012· article· en· W2556648691 on OpenAlexaff
Gabriela Schneider, Chihwa Kim, Ahmed Abdel‐Latif, Anna Janowska‐Wieczorek, Janina Ratajczak, Mariusz Z. Ratajczak

Bibliographic record

VenueBlood · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHoming (biology)Progenitor cellBone marrowCXCR4Stromal cellHaematopoiesisStem cellCell biologyPlerixaforMale-pattern baldnessBiologyCancer researchImmunologyChemistryChemokineInflammationAnatomy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Abstract 1247 Background. Hematopoietic stem progenitor cells (HSPCs) are retained in bone marrow (BM) niches due to the stromal-derived growth factor-1 (SDF-1)–CXCR4 receptor axis and interactions between Very Late Antigen-4 (VLA-4, also known as α 4β1integrin) and its ligand, Vascular Adhesion Molecule-1 (VCAM-1 or CD106). While HSPCs express CXCR4 and VLA-4, their corresponding ligands, SDF-1 and VCAM-1, are expressed by cells in the BM microenvironment (e.g., osteoblasts and fibroblasts). While a role for the SDF-1–CXCR4 axis in the retention of HSPCs in BM under steady-state conditions is undisputed, its role in stem cell homing needs further clarification. For many years, it has been assumed that the chemotactic SDF-1 gradient across the BM–peripheral blood (PB) barrier determines whether cells home from PB into the BM microenvironment. However, this simple explanation has been challenged by several observations supporting the existence of SDF-1–CXCR4-independent homing mechanisms. For example, i) CXCR4−/− fetal liver HSPCs can home to BM in an SDF-1-independent manner, ii) homing of murine HSPCs made refractory to SDF-1 by preincubation and co-injection with a CXCR4 receptor antagonist (AMD3100) is normal or only mildly reduced, iii) HSPCs in which CXCR4 expression is reduced by a SDF-1 intrakine strategy remain able to engraft in lethally irradiated recipients, and, as we recently reported, iv) myeloablative conditioning for transplantation induces a highly proteolytic microenvironment in BM that leads to proteolytic degradation of SDF-1 (Cancer Res. 2010;70:3402, Leukemia. 2012;26:106). Aim of the study. Based on these observations strongly suggesting the involvement of other factors and/or supportive mechanisms in the SDF-1-mediated homing of HSPCs, we became interested in identifying these unknown factors, which support homing of HSPCs when SDF-1 is degraded in the proteolytic microenvironment of BM or even if it is completely absent. Experimental approach. We tested several growth factors, cytokines, bioactive lipids, extracellular nucleotides, and antimicrobial cationic peptides for their potential involvement in homing by employing i) Transwell migration assays and ii) signaling studies in the presence or absence of specific inhibitors. We studied the chemotactic responsiveness of these factors against BM, umbilical cord blood (UCB), and mobilized peripheral blood (mPB) cells. We also focused on the molecular mechanisms responsible for the observed phenomena. Salient observations. Out of >50 different factors tested in addition to SDF-1, only sphingosine-1-phosphate (S1P), ceramide-1-phosphate (C1P), ATP, UTP, and GTP, which are released by cells after BM microenvironment damaged by radio/chemotherapy conditioning for transplantation, were able to chemoattract BM-purified HSPCs. The responsiveness of HSPCs to these factors was inhibited after exposure to pertussis toxin (PTX) and after inhibiting MAPKp42/44 and AKT. Interestingly, in contrast to BM-isolated HSPCs, the chemotactic responsiveness of UCB and mPB HSPCs to these factors was significantly weaker, which suggests desensitization of the corresponding receptors by factors already present in peripheral blood plasma. We also found that BM stroma exposed to myeloablative doses of radio-chemotherapy secretes two antimicrobial cationic peptides, LL-37 and β2-defensin, that, while not direct chemottractants for HSPCs, strongly enhance the responsiveness of HSPCs to an SDF-1 gradient. This phenomenon plays a crucial role in situations in which the SDF-1 homing gradient is impaired by a highly proteolytic BM microenvironment after myeloablative conditioning for transplantation. Conclusions. Since all these direct chemottractants and priming factors are upregulated in BM after myeloblative conditioning for transplantation, a more complex picture of homing emerges that involves several factors that support, and in some situations even replace, the SDF-1–CXCR4 axis. We also conclude that the priming effects by LL-37 and β2-defensin play a critical role in homing of UCB- and mPB-derived HSPCs, which respond robustly to an SDF-1 gradient. Moreover, data in an animal model lend further support to this concept. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.012

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.044
GPT teacher head0.287
Teacher spread0.243 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBlood→Same topicHematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation→French-language works237,207→