MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

The Clinical Course of Untreated Gaucher Disease in 22 Patients Over 10 Years: Hematological and Skeletal Manifestations.

2008· article· en· W2556681956 on OpenAlexaffabout
Siavash Piran, Andrew K. Roberts, Mary Anne Patterson, Dominick Amato

Bibliographic record

VenueBlood · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicLysosomal Storage Disorders Research
Canadian institutionsMount Sinai HospitalQueen's UniversityUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEnzyme replacement therapyMedicineHepatosplenomegalyGastroenterologyInternal medicineAnemiaBone marrowSurgeryDisease

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Gaucher disease (GD) is a lysosomal storage disorder characterized by anemia and thrombocytopenia, hepatosplenomegaly, and skeletal involvement. The management of Gaucher disease was improved by the development of enzyme replacement therapy (ERT). However, the bone response to ERT is generally slower compared to other clinical manifestations. Some have recommended the early use of ERT to prevent the development of severe skeletal complications. Because we have access to over 30 untreated patients in Ontario, we questioned the extent to which the bony complications progress in severity over a long period of time. We examined retrospectively the natural history of GD and the extent of skeletal manifestations in 22 untreated type 1 GD adult patients (mean age 49 ± 3.3, range of 20–81 years). Ten patients were N370S homozygotes and twelve were compound heterozygotes. The patients were followed for a median of 9.5 years (range of 3 to 16 years). Assessments included complete blood counts (CBC); levels of angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE), ferritin, and chitotriosidase; liver and spleen volumes; and occurrences of bony complications. Dual Energy X-ray Absorptiometry (DEXA), Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) of femurs, skeletal survey, and plain radiography were utilized to assess bony complications in 21 patients. Hemoglobin (Hb) concentration did not significantly change over time (mean baseline concentration of 12.8 ± 0.27 g/dL vs mean recent concentration of 12.6 ± 0.37 g/dL, p = 0.65). Mean platelet count also remained relatively stable over time (mean baseline count of 138 ± 13 × 109/L vs mean recent count of 138.5 ± 18 × 109/L, p = 0.98). Mean ferritin and ACE concentrations were elevated and were stable over time. Liver volumes decreased over time (mean baseline liver volume of 1.2 × normal (N) vs mean recent volume of 1.06 × N, p = 0.27) and 6/21 (29%) patients had moderate hepatomegaly (liver volume ≥ 1.25 × N). Spleen volumes remained stable over time (mean baseline spleen volume of 6.4 × N vs mean recent volume of 5.1 × N, p = 0.56). None of the changes was statistically significant. Three of 19 (15.8 %) patients had moderate splenomegaly (spleen volume ≥ 5 × N), 2/19 (10.5%) had severe splenomegaly (spleen volume ≥ 15 × N), and 2/22 (9%) had splenectomy. The most common skeletal manifestations were infiltration of the bone marrow in 15/21 (71%) patients followed by osteopenia in 14/21 patients (67%), and infarctions in 6/21 (29%) patients. Other bony complications included osteoporosis in 3/21 (14%), avascular necrosis (AVN) in the left knee and femur in 1/21 (5%), and osteolysis in 1/21 (5%) patients; there were no cases of fractures. Three of 21 (14%) patients developed new infarcts (2N370S homozygous patients) over time, 1/21 (5%) developed AVN, and 4/21 (19%) had an increase in the degree of osteopenia. There were no significant differences observed between the N370S homozygous and compound heterozygous patients. Although GD and its skeletal complications progress in severity in some patients, our results suggest that GD complications including bony disease may stabilize over time. Therefore, early use of ERT may not be necessary in all type 1 GD patients.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.013
Threshold uncertainty score0.025

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.340
Teacher spread0.310 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2008
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBloodSame topicLysosomal Storage Disorders ResearchFrench-language works237,207