Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cet article propose une réflexion sur l’état actuel du « modèle canadien » marqué par une intensification du recours à la privation de liberté. L’enfermement y est analysé comme une violence lente et invisible (Nixon, 2011) qui semble engendrer une indifférence morale et un processus de déshumanisation tels que conçus par Bauman (2002). En mobilisant les concepts d’univers d’obligation morale (Fein, 1979) et d’économie morale (Fassin, 2009), l’auteure soutient que les politiques et les pratiques de privation de liberté opèrent une mise à l’écart et une différenciation de certains individus qui n’est pas uniquement spatiale et sociale, mais également morale. L’exaltation de sentiments moraux et d’émotions est ainsi envisagée comme au cœur de la construction sociale de l’enfermement, aussi bien au niveau des normes qui encadrent sa pratique que dans les valeurs au nom desquelles la société prive certains individus de leur liberté.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.012 | 0.009 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.014 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".