MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2556749766 · doi:10.3917/ds.404.0477

L’économie morale de l’enfermement au Canada

2016· article· fr· W2556749766 on OpenAlexaffabout
Sandra Lehalle

Bibliographic record

VenueDéviance et Société · 2016
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldHealth Professions
TopicEmployment and Welfare Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPolitical sciencePhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Cet article propose une réflexion sur l’état actuel du « modèle canadien » marqué par une intensification du recours à la privation de liberté. L’enfermement y est analysé comme une violence lente et invisible (Nixon, 2011) qui semble engendrer une indifférence morale et un processus de déshumanisation tels que conçus par Bauman (2002). En mobilisant les concepts d’univers d’obligation morale (Fein, 1979) et d’économie morale (Fassin, 2009), l’auteure soutient que les politiques et les pratiques de privation de liberté opèrent une mise à l’écart et une différenciation de certains individus qui n’est pas uniquement spatiale et sociale, mais également morale. L’exaltation de sentiments moraux et d’émotions est ainsi envisagée comme au cœur de la construction sociale de l’enfermement, aussi bien au niveau des normes qui encadrent sa pratique que dans les valeurs au nom desquelles la société prive certains individus de leur liberté.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.620
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.058
GPT teacher head0.399
Teacher spread0.342 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2016
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDéviance et SociétéSame topicEmployment and Welfare StudiesFrench-language works237,207