MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2556921987

ROBUST EXTRACTION OF TRAFFIC SIGNS FROM GEOREFERENCED MOBILE MAPPING IMAGES

2009· article· en· W2556921987 on OpenAlexaff
Alexander Reiterer, Taher Hassan

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAutomated Road and Building Extraction
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGNSS applicationsScale-invariant feature transformComputer scienceGeoreferenceFeature extractionGlobal Positioning SystemComputer visionMatching (statistics)Data miningArtificial intelligenceReal-time computingGeographyTelecommunications
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Modern Driver Assistance Systems (DAS) are required to assist, guide, and control vehicles on highways and city streets based on GNSS, INS and map matching. They play an important role in modern vehicles navigation. Although a GNSS-navigation system can be updated in view of the modifications of the roads, it does not include exhaustive information about the traffic signalization. It would be useful to signal to a driver at least some important traffic signs. This paper presents the basic concept of a new approach for the automated detection of traffic signs to be incorporated in DASs. The developed procedure is based on the well known Scale Invariant Feature Transform (SIFT) algorithm. The results of extensive testing on real data sets show that the presented approach detects and classifies over 70% of traffic signs correctly.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.225
Teacher spread0.206 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAutomated Road and Building ExtractionFrench-language works237,207