Study of the Binding of Thiazolyazoresorcinol and Thiazolyazocresol Dyes with BSA and Adenine by Spectral, Electrochemical and Molecular Docking Methods
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Interaction of thiazolyazoresorcinol (TAR) and thiazolyazocresol (TAC) with bovine serum albumin (BSA) and DNA base (adenine) were investigated by UV-visible, fluorescence, ATR - IR spectroscopy, cyclic voltammetry and molecular docking methods. The results studied by ATR-IR indicate that the secondary structures of the protein have been changed by the interaction of TAR and TAC with BSA. After the addition of TAR and TAC solution into BSA and adenine, the oxidative peak currents increased with the negatively shift of the peak potential and no appearance of new peak. The results from electrochemical studies suggested that the response of TAR and TAC at glassy carbon electrode was a diffuse controlled irreversible process. The results of molecular docking calculation clarify the binding mode and the binding sites which are in good accordance with the experiment results and hydrophobic force play a major role in the binding.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".