Nonmyeloablative Versus Myeloablative Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant for GATA2 Deficiency
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Background: Mutations in the zinc finger transcription factor GATA2 are responsible for: MonoMAC, monocytopenia with nontuberculous mycobacterial (NTM) infections; DCML, dendritic cell, monocyte and lymphoid cell deficiency; Emberger's syndrome with lymphedema and monosomy 7; and familial myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS)/acute myelogenous leukemia (AML). Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) is the only definitive therapy for GATA2 deficiency. Methods: We used matched related donors (MRD), matched unrelated donors (URD), umbilical cord blood (UCB), and haploidentical related donors in allogeneic HSCT for GATA2 deficiency. Fourteen patients received a nonmyeloablative conditioning regimen (4 MRD, 4 URD, 4 UCB, and 2 haplo donors). Five patients received a myeloablative conditioning regimen (1 MRD, 2 URD, and 2 haplo donors). In the nonmyeloablative group, MRD and MUD recipients received fludarabine and 200cGy of total body irradiation (TBI), UCB recipients received cyclophosphamide 50mg/kg, fludarabine 150 mg/m2, and 200cGy of TBI, and haploidentical related donor recipients received cyclophosphamide 29 mg/kg, fludarabine 150 mg/m2, and 200 cGy TBI. In the myeloablative group, MRD and URD received busulfan 12.8 mg/kg and fludarabine 160 mg/m2, and haploidentical related donors received the same regimen as in the nonmyeloablative regimen except for the addition of two days of busulfan 6.4 mg/kg total dose. Nonmyeloablative MRD and URD recipients received tacrolimus and sirolimus post-transplant, and myeloablative MRD and URD recipients received tacrolimus and short course methotrexate post-transplant. All haploidentical related donor recipients received cyclophosphamide 50 mg/kg/day on days + 3 and +4 followed by tacrolimus and mycophenolate mofetil. Three patients in the nonmyeloablative cohort required one or more rounds of pre-transplant chemotherapy because of an increased number of blasts, whereas none of the 5 patients in the myeloablative arm required pre-transplant chemotherapy. Results: In the nonmyeloablative cohort, 8 of 14 (57%) of patients are alive at a median follow-up of 3.7 years (range 12 months to 5 years). One MRD recipient died of GVHD and one relapsed, one URD recipient rejected the donor stem cells and died, three UCB recipient died (one rejection, one early death, and one donor cell leukemia), and one haploidentical recipient died from regimen-related toxicity. All 5 patients (100%) in the myeloablative group, including two recipients of haploidentical related donors, are alive at a median follow-up of 9.2 months (range 6 to 12 months). All patients who survived had complete reconstitution of the monocyte, NK, and B-lymphocyte compartments, the three cell compartments that were severely deficient pre-transplant, and all had reversal of the infection susceptibility phenotype, characteristic of the disease. In particular, there were no recurrences of non-tuberculous mycobacterial (NTM) infections. Conclusions: Nonmyeloablative HSCT results in reversal of the hematologic and clinical manifestations of GATA2 deficiency. However, a more intensive conditioning regimen with busulfan resulted in more uniform engraftment, a reduced risk of relapse, avoidance of pre-transplant chemotherapy, and a low regimen-related toxicity. We anticipate that with the use of a high-dose regimen with busulfan, the replacement of UCB with haploidentical related donors, and HSCT earlier in the clinical course, before significant organ damage or clonal evolution of MDS to AML or CMML, the outcome of allogeneic HSCT in patients with GATA2 deficiency will continue to improve. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".