MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2557084566 · doi:10.1109/epec.2010.5697231

An intelligent weather-based system to support optimal routing of power transmission lines

2010· article· en· W2557084566 on OpenAlexaff
Pawel Pytlak, Petr Musı́lek

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicThermal Analysis in Power Transmission
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsUpgradeElectric power transmissionReturn on investmentComputer scienceElectric power systemRenewable energyRouting (electronic design automation)Transmission (telecommunications)Transmission linePower transmissionPower (physics)TelecommunicationsEngineeringElectrical engineeringEmbedded system

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The recent increase in demand for power and the proliferation of remotely located renewable energy sources, have put pressure on electric power utilities to upgrade and expand their existing transmission infrastructure. Unfortunately, the construction of new power transmission lines is a costly and time consuming endeavour. In order to maximize the return on investment in the construction of new power transmission lines, this process should be supported by information on the climatological conditions in the planned area, and their effect on the power line operating conditions and ageing. This paper presents an intelligent system that supports the optimization of the line routing process using high-resolution meteorological data. The proposed system selects waypoint coordinates for the transmission line using an algorithm that attempts to minimize the line temperature by avoiding locations that are prone to cause temperature hot-spots. This, in turn, provides gains in additional transmission capacity when coupled with Dynamic Thermal Rating technology, allowing utility companies to increase the return on investment even further.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.241
Teacher spread0.234 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations17
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicThermal Analysis in Power TransmissionFrench-language works237,207