MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2557317678 · doi:10.1159/000453064

Timing of Hormone Withdrawal in Children Undergoing <sup>131</sup>I Whole-Body Scans for Thyroid Cancer

2016· article· en· W2557317678 on OpenAlexaff
Sophie Turpin, Raymond Lambert, Cheri Deal

Bibliographic record

VenueHormone Research in Paediatrics · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicThyroid Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
Canadian institutionsCentre Hospitalier Universitaire Sainte-Justine
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineLevothyroxineDiscontinuationHormoneThyroidThyroidectomyThyroid cancerInternal medicineGastroenterologyEndocrinology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Little objective pediatric data exist to guide the optimal time needed to achieve thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH) levels ≥30 μIU/mL prior to performing 131I or 123I whole-body scan (WBS) imaging in children with thyroid cancer in the post-thyroidectomy period or after hormone discontinuation. METHODS: Retrospective study of patients aged 5-19 years who underwent WBS. Patient data collection included type and duration of withdrawal (liothyronine [L-T3], levothyroxine [L-T4], or post-thyroidectomy status without hormonal replacement) and TSH measured prior to WBS (level and timing). RESULTS: A total of 175 TSH level measurements were performed in 68 patients. Thirty-five TSH values were obtained 2-7 weeks postoperatively and 101 values were obtained 2-8 weeks post L-T4 withdrawal. One patient in each group had a TSH level <30 μIU/mL. There was no difference in TSH levels between 3 weeks and 4 weeks postoperatively (p = 0.14) or post L-T4 cessation (p = 0.21). Thirty-nine TSH measurements were obtained 1-28 days post L-T3 withdrawal. Three patients had to be rescheduled due to inadequate TSH levels, including one after 14 days L-T3 withdrawal. CONCLUSION: TSH levels ≥30 μIU/mL were achieved at 3 weeks post thyroidectomy or after L-T4 withdrawal and after at least 2 weeks following L-T3 cessation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.140
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.038
GPT teacher head0.339
Teacher spread0.301 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueHormone Research in PaediatricsSame topicThyroid Cancer Diagnosis and TreatmentFrench-language works237,207