MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2557410562 · doi:10.1109/jsen.2016.2634588

Reducing Measurement Error in Capacitive Readout Circuits Based on Weakly Coupled Resonators

2016· article· en· W2557410562 on OpenAlexaff
Siamak Hafizi-Moori, Edmond Cretu

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Sensors Journal · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAnalog and Mixed-Signal Circuit Design
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCapacitive sensingResonatorElectronic circuitOptoelectronicsElectrical engineeringElectronic engineeringMaterials sciencePhysicsComputer scienceEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A recently proposed method for measuring minute changes in capacitance based on weakly coupled resonators has been examined for its sensitivity with respect to unwanted resonant frequency changes. This sensitivity has been compared with the conventional capacitance measurement method based on the capacitance to frequency conversion. It has been analytically shown that both sensitivities are nearly equal but with opposite signs. This has led to a new hybrid capacitance measurement method to reduce the error by at least an order of magnitude. The analytical results have been validated by various simulations and experimental measurements.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.195
Threshold uncertainty score0.896

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.037
GPT teacher head0.228
Teacher spread0.190 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Sensors JournalSame topicAnalog and Mixed-Signal Circuit DesignFrench-language works237,207